Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSholahudin, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorNasir, Moechamad
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-07T04:02:07Z
dc.date.available2015-05-07T04:02:07Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.citationAdcroft, A., Wills, R. dan Dhaliwal, S. (2004). Missing the point? Management education and entrepreneurship. Management Decision. 42(3): 512-521. Antoncic, B. (2007). Intrapreneurship: A comparative structural equation modeling study. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 107(3): 309-325. Baum, J.A. dan Locke, E.A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology. 89(4): 587-598. Beaver, G. (2002). Small Business, Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development. Pearson Education, London. Bechard, J.P. dan Gregoire, D. (2005). Entrepreneurship education research revisited: The case of higher education. Academy of Management, Learning & Education. 4(1): 22-43. Boyd, R.L. (2005). Race, gender, and survival entrepreneurship in large northern cities during the Great Depression. Journal of Socio-economics. 34. 331-339. Brindley, C. (2005). Barriers to women achieving their entrepreneurial potential: Women and risk. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. 11(2): 144-161. Bruni, A., Gheradi, S. dan Poggio, B. (2004). Entrepreneur-mentality, gender and the study of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 17(3): 256-268. Buang, N.A. , Halim, L., dan Meerah, M.T.S., (2009). Understanding the thinking of scientists entrepreneurs: Implications for science education in Malaysia. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 6(2): 3-11. Carrier, C., Raymond, L., dan Eltaief, A. (2004). Cyberentrepreneurship: A multiple case study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. 10(5): 349-363. Cheung, C.K. (2008). Entrepreneurship education in Hong Kong’s secondary curriculum: Possibilities and limitations. Education + Training. 50(6): 500-515. Colombo, M.S. dan Delmastro, M. (2001). Technology-based entrepreneurs: Does internet make a difference. Small Business Economics. 16. 177-190. Covin, J. G., Green, K. M., dan Slevin, D. P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation - sales growth rate relationships. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1): 57-81. de Pillis, E. dan Reardon, K.K. (2007). The influence of personality traits and persuasive messages on entrepreneurial intention: A cross-cultural comparison. Career Development International. 12(4): 382-396. Davidsson, P. dan Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing. 18. 301-331. Dickson, P.H., Solomon, G.T., dan Weaver, K.M. (2008). Entrepreneurial selection and success: Does education matter? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 15(2): 239-258. Doherty, G.D. (2008). On quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education. 16(3): 255-265. Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., dan Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: A new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training. 30(9): 701-720. Fayolle, A. dan Klandt, H. (2006). Issues and newness in the field of entrepreneurship education: New lenses for new practical and academic questions, dalam Fayolle, A. dan Klandt, H. (Eds). International Entrepreneurship Education, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA. Fayolle, A. dan Gailly, B. (2008). From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education. Journal of European Industrial Training. 32(7): 569-593. Fiet, J.O. (2000). The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing. 16(1): 1-24. Grégoire, D.A., Corbett, A.C., dan McMullen, J.S. (2011). The cognitive perspective in entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research.jJournal of Management Studies. 48(6): 1443-1477. Hamidi, D.Y., Wennberg, K., dan Berglund, H. (2008). Creativity in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 15(2): 304320. Harms, R., Kraus, S., dan Reschke, C.H. (2007). Configurations of new ventures in entrepreneurship research: Contributions and research gaps. Management Research News. 30(9): 661-673. Hegarty, C. (2006). It’s not an exact science: Teaching entrepreneurship in Northern Ireland. Education + Training. 48(5): 322-335. Hytti, U. (2005). New meanings for entrepreneurs: From risk-taking heroes to safe-seeking professionals. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 18(6): 594-611. Johnson, D., Craig, J.B.L., dan Hildebrand, R. (2006). Entrepreneurship education: Towards a discipline-based framework. Journal of Management Development. 25 (1): 40-54. Kamaruddin, A. (2006). Proyeksi pengembangan kebutuhan wirausaha baru dalam rangka kesiapan menuju liberalisasi perdagangan dan investasi. Jurnal Pengkajian Koperasi dan UKM. 1(2): 84-98. Katz, J.A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing. 18(3): 283-300. Kearney, C., Hisrich, R.D., dan Roche, F. (2009). Public and private sector entrepreneurship: Similarities, differences or a combination? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 16(1): 26-46. Klappa, R. (2004). Government goals and entrepreneurship education. Education + Training. 46(3): 127-138. Kocak, A. dan Abimbola, T. (2009). The effects of entrepreneurial marketing on born global performance. International Marketing Review. 26 (4/5): 439-452. Krasniqi, B.A. (2009). Personal, household and business environmental determinants of entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 16(1): 146-166. Langowitz, N. dan Minniti, M. (2007). The entrepreneurial propensity of womenEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 31(3): 341-364. Le´vesque, M. dan Minniti, M. (2005). The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behaviourJournal of Business Venturing. 21. 177-194. Luthje, C. dan Franke, N. (2003). The making of an entrepreneur: Testing a model ofentrepreneurial intent among engineering students at MIT. R&D Management33(2): 135-147. Maire, D., Petersen, J. dan Schjerning, B. (2004). An econometric inquiry into selfemployment in Denmark. working paper no. 2004-02, Center for Economic andBusiness Research (CEBR), London. Malach-Pines, A. dan Schwartz, D. (2008). Now you see them, now you don’t: Gendedifferences in entrepreneurship. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 23(7): 811832. Mason, C. (2011). Entrepreneurship education and research: Emerging trends and concerns. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship. 1(1): 13-25. McClelland, E., Swail, J., Bell, J., dan Ibbotson, P. (2005). Following the pathway offemale entrepreneurs: A six-country investigation. International Journal oEntrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. 11(2): 84-107. Millman, C., Matlay, H., dan Liu, F. (2008). Entrepreneurship education in China: A casstudy approach. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 15 (4):802-815. Morrisette, S. dan Schraeder, M (2007). Affirming entrepreneurship: The best hope fororganizations. Development and Learning in Organizations. 21(1): 15-17. Murphy, P.J., Liao, J., dan Welsch, H.P. (2006). A conceptual history of entrepreneuriathought. Journal of Management History. 12(1): 12-35. Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: Anassessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal28(2): 121-146. Noel, T.W. (2001). Effects of entrepreneurial education on intent to open a business Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson Conference Proceedings, www.babson.edu/entrep/fer Noorderhaven, N., Thurik, R., Wennekers, S. dan van Stel, A. (2004). The role of dissatisfaction and per capita income in explaining self-employment across 15 European countries. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 28(5): 447-66. Nurmi, P. dan Paasio, K. (2007). Entrepreneurship in Finnish Universities. Education + Training. 49(1): 56-66. Pines, A.M., Lerner, M., dan Schwartz, D. (2010). Gender differences in entrepreneurship: Equality, diversity and inclusion in times of global crisis. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal. 29(2): 186-198. Pittaway, L. (2005). Philosophies in entrepreneurship: A focus on economic theories. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. 11(3): 201-221. Poon, J. M. L., Ainuddin, R. A., dan Junit, S. H. (2006). Effects of self-concept traits and entrepreneurial orientation of firm performance. International Small Business Journal. 24(1), 61-82. Priyono, E. (2011). Pemetaan potensi kewirausahaan di sekitar kampus: Kasus di UMS, Laporan Penelitian Kolaboratif, FE - UMS, Solo. --------- (2010). Identifikasi unit usaha dan potensi pengembangan kewirausahaan di sekitar lingkungan kampus: Kasus di UMS. Laporan Penelitian Kolaboratif, FE - UMS, Solo. Saboe, L.R., Kantor, J. dan Walsh, J. (2002). Cultivating entrepreneurship. Educational Leadership. 59(7): 80-82. Schwarz, E.J., Wdowiak, M.A., Almer-Jarz, D.A., dan Breitenecker, R.J. (2009). The effects of attitudes and perceived environment conditions on students’ entrepreneurial intent: An Austrian perspective. Education + Training. 51(4): 272-291. Shane, S. dan Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review. 25(1): 217-226. Shaw, E. dan Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 14(3): 418-434. Shepherd, D.A. (2004). Educating entrepreneurship students about emotion and learning from failure. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 3(3): 274-287. Simpeh, K.N. (2011). Entrepreneurship theories and empirical research: A summary review of the literature. European Journal of Business and Management. 3(6): 1-9. Solomon, G.t., Duffy, S. Tarabishy, A. (2002). The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: A nationwide survey and analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. 1(1): 65-86. Urbano, D., Aponte, M., dan Toledano, N. (2008). Doctoral education in entrepreneurship: A European case study. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 15(2): 336-347. van Praag, C.M. dan Versloot, P.H. (2008). The economic benefits and costs of entrepreneurship: A review of the research. Foundations and Trends Entrepreneurship. 4 (2): 65-154. Wagner, J. dan Sternberg, R. (2002). Personal and regional determinants of entrepreneurial activities: Empirical evidence from regional entrepreneurship monitor (REM) Germany. discussion paper no. 624, Institute for Study of Labour (IZA), Bonn. Wibawani, S. dan Harpowo (2009). Budaya wirausaha pada mahasiswa fakultas pertanian Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Laporan Penelitian, UMM Malang. Yohnson (2003). Peranan universitas dalam memotivasi sarjana menjadi young entrepreneurs. Jurnal Manajemen & Kewirausahaa. 5(2): 97-111. Yu, C.W.M. dan Man, T.W.Y. (2009). Social interaction and the formation of entrepreneurial characteristics: A case study in authentic enterprise activity. Journal of Workplace Learning. 21(8): 595-613.in_ID
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/5845
dc.description.abstractSinergi antara peran dunia pendidikan tinggi dan kewirausahaan sangatlah penting terutama untuk mereduksi adanya gap antara kuantitas dan kualitas sarjana yang mencari kerja dan yang menciptakan lapangan kerja. Penelitian ini berusaha untuk membangun model edukasi kewirausahaan berbasis potensi pasar lokal. Hal ini sangatlah penting karena potensi pasar lokal lebih membuka peluang dalam pengembangan kewirausahaan, terutama yang dapat dilakukan oleh mahasiswa. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini adalah bagaimana model untuk edukasi kewirausahaan yang terbaik bagi mahasiswa, terutama mengacu pada potensi pasar lokal. Teknik analisis pada tahun pertama adalah dengan pendekatan kualitatif mengacu pemetaan hasil berbagai riset empiris terkait kewirausahaan untuk membangun hipotesis dan model awal, sedangkan untuk tahun kedua yaitu dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui diseminasi – FGD untuk verifikasi model dan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan uji model. Hasil pemetaan menunjukan bahwa riset tentang kewirausahaan dilakukan dengan berbagai model pendekatan dengan mengacu setting amatan yang berbeda, kasus di negara yang berbeda dan keragaman variabel, juga alat analisis. Tahun amatan dari hasil pemetaan yaitu periode 2004-2010 dari publikasi di emerald, negara amatan untuk kasus riset empiris tentang kewirausahaan di negara maju dan negara berkembang, model pendekatan adalah kualitatif dan kuantitatif sedangkan untuk alat analisis dilakukan dengan dua cara yaitu alat analisis mengacu statistik dan alat analisis hasil interview dengan keyperson. Alat analisis dengan statistik dibedakan menjadi dua yaitu dengan SEM dan regresi sederhana. Temuan ini menunjukan bahwa keberagaman riset tentang kewirausahaan menjadi bagian penting dalam memahami fluktuasi perkembangan kewirausahaan sehingga memperkaya temuan hasil dan generalisasinya.in_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartain_ID
dc.subjectKewirausahaanin_ID
dc.subjectedukasiin_ID
dc.subjectmahasiswain_ID
dc.titleModel Edukasi Kewirausahaan Berbasis Potensi Pasar Lokal: Kasus di Lingkungan PTN dan PTS di Soloin_ID
dc.typeTechnical Reportin_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record