| dc.identifier.citation | Anonim. 2006. Pengaruh karakteristik dan faktor kondisi kerja dengan kepuasan kerja perawat Puskesmas di Kabupaten Pati. Diakses 9 Maret 2006. http://www.mikmundip. or.id/data/index.php As’ad, M. 1991. Psikologi industri edisi keempat.Liberty: Yogyakarta Gibson, JL., Ivancevich, JM., Donelly, JH. 1997. Perilaku organisasi: struktur dan proses. Bina Rupa Aksara: Jakarta Holcomb, BR., Hoffart, N. 2002. Defining and measuring nursing productivity: a concept analysis and pilot study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 38 (4), 378–386. Husin, M. 1995. Upaya membina sikap dan kemampuan profesional perawat. Yayasan Universitas Pelita Harapan: Jakarta Ilyas, Y. 2000. Perencanaan sumber daya manusia rumah sakit: teori, metoda dan formula. Pusat Kajian Ekonomi Kesehatan FKM UI: Jakarta La Monica, EL. 1996. Kepemimpinan dan manajemen keperawatan: pendekatan berdasarkan pengalaman, EGC: Jakarta Marquis, BL., Huston, CJ. 2006. Management decision making for nurses, 3rd ed, Lippincott, Philadelphia. Nurachmah E. 2003. Restrukturisasi dalam keperawatan. Majalah Keperawatan Bina Sehat 2003; 3: 5-9. Peterson, K. 1998. The strategic approach to quality service in health care, Rockville, MD: Aspen Publisher. Polit, DF., Hungler, BP. 1999. Nursing research: principles and methods, 6th ed. J. B Lippincot Co. RSUD Dr Moewardi. 2005. Laporan tahunan indikator pelayanan kesehatan, Bidang Keperawatan Surakarta Sitorus, R. 2003. Model praktik keperawatan sebagai upaya meningkatkan profesionalisme dalam pelayanan keperawatan. Majalah Keperawatan Bina Sehat 2003; 3: 10-14. Sriyatun. 2003. Hubungan supervisi kepala ruang dengan pendokumentasian asuhan keperawatan di RSUD Dr.Moewardi Surakarta. Skripsi. Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan STIKES Ngudi Waluyo: Ungaran Suardana, IK. 2006. Studi komparatif produktifitas kerja perawat yang melaksanakan metode penugasan tim-fungsional dengan metode fungsional di RSUD Tabanan dan Gianyar Bali. Diakses 7 Maret 2006. http//www.digilib.ui.ac.id/ as retrieved on 7 Maret 2006. Sumarni, E. 2001. Hubungan antara efektifitas kepemimpinan kepala ruang dan motivasi dengan produktivitas kerja perawat pelaksana di RSUD Kabupaten Tasikmalaya Jabar, Tesis. Program Magister Ilmu Keperawatan FIK UI: Jakarta Supratman. 1999. Analisis kepuasan kerja perawat di RSD Dr.Soedjati Purwodadi Grobogan. Jurnal Kesehatan Infokes. 1:10-16. _________ . 2003. Analisis prestasi kerja di RS Islam Jakarta. Jurnal Kesehatan Infokes. 7(1): 20- 25. _________2002. Faktor-faktor determinant mutu asuhan keperawatan di Rumah Sakit Islam Surakarta. Laporan Penelitian. Surakarta: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masayarakat UMS Swansburg, RC., Swansburg, RJ. 1999. Introductory management and leadership for clinical nurses: an interactive text, 2nd ed. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc. Tappen, RM. 1998. Essential of nursing leadership and management. Davis Co: Philadelphia Wise, Y. 1995. Leading and managing in nursing. Mosby, St. Louis: New York | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Problems of nursing services at the Moewardi Hospital, for instance increase of patient dissatisfaction
(60%), nurse’s workload (68,8%), ratio nurse’s-patient 1:10, nursing care delivery still a lot of use
functional method. The aims of this study was to compare nurse productivity between team-functional
method (group 1) and functional method (group 2). Research design is descriptive comparatif.
Research conducted at the Moewardi Hospital Surakarta Central Java Province since Juli-October
2007. Population is nurse and patient in the care unit (non intensive care unit). Sample of group 1 as
much 28 who is taken from total population. While sample group 2 as much 68 one who is taken from
simple random. Data measurement use questionnaire has adopted from Minnesota Satisfaction
Questionnaire from Peterson, also documentation of nursing care from Department of Health Republic
of Indonesia. Technique of measurement using the self-administered of where respondent fill by
themself. Data analyze aims to make the inference with the Chi-square, Ratio Prevalence (RP), and
Confident Interval (CI.95%) with level of significance (alpha=5%). Result of study is any proportion
differences (in amount) nurse productivity between team-functional method and functional method. Yet
statistically the differences (compare) have no significant with X2=2,38 p>0,05. | en_US |
