| dc.identifier.citation | Anderson, James E. 1976. Public Policy Making. New York: Praeger Publishers. Andrain, Charles F. 1992. Kehidupan Politik dan Perubahan Sosial, terj. Luqman Hakim. Yogyakarta: PT Tiara Wacana Yogya. Anwar, M. Syafi’i. 1995. Pemikiran dan Aksi Islam Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Paramadina. Ayoob, Mohammed. 2008. The Many Faces of Political Islam. Michigan: University of Michigan Press. Ayubi, Nazih. 1991, Political Islam: Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Arab World. London and New York: Routledge. Basyir, A.A. 1985. Hubungan Agama dan Pancasila. Yogyakarta: UII Press. Benin, J and Stork, J. 1997, Political Islam: Essays from Middle East Report. New York: I.B. Tauris Publisher. Case, William. 2002. Politics in Southeast Asia: Democracy Or Less. London: Routledge Curzon. Dekmejian R. Hrair. 1988. “Islamic Revival: Catalysts, Categories and Consequences” in Shireen T. Hunter (ed.). The Politics of Islamic Revivalism. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Effendy, Bahtiar. 1998. Islam dan Negara: Transformasi Pemikiran dan Praktik Politik Islam di Indonesia, terj. Ihsan Ali Fauzi. Jakarta: Penerbit Paramadina. Etzioni Amitai. 1968. Mixed Scanning: A Third Approach to Decision-Making . Public Administration Review. Vol. 27. Elson, Robert E. 2001. Suharto: A Political Biography. UK: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Esposito, John L.(ed.). 1987. Islam in Asia: Religion, Politics, and Society. (Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fachir, A.M. 2009. Potret Hubungan Indonesia-Mesir. Cet.I. Cairo: KBRI. Fuller, Graham. 2003. The Future of Political Islam. New York: Palgrave. Goldschmidt, Arthur. 2002. A Concise History of the Middle East. 7th ed. (Colorado: Westview Press. Goodin, Robert E. and Hans Dieter Klingemann. 1988. A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hagopian, Mark N. 1978. Regimes, Movements and Ideologies. New York: Longman. Hague, Rod, Martin Harrop & Shaun Breslin. 1998. Comparative Politics and Government: An Introduction. 4th ed. London: MacMillan. Heywood, Andrew. 2002. Politics. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave. Hilmy, Masdar. 2010. Islamism and Democracy in Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS. Islam, Syed Sirajul. 2005. The Politics of Islamic Identiy in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Thomson. Jeong, Ho-Won. 2008. Understanding Conflict and Conflict Analysis. London: SAGE. Karim, M. Rusli. 1983. Perjalanan Partai Politik di Indonesia. Cet.1. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali. ————————. 1985. Dinamika Islam di Indonesia: Suatu Tinjauan Sosial dan Politik. Yogyakarta: Hanindita. Lipset, Seymour Martin (ed.). 1995. The Encyclopedia of Democracy. Washington D.C: Congressional Quarterly Inc. Macridis, Roy C. and Bernard E. Brown (eds.). 1997. Comparative Politics: Notes and Readings. 5th ed., Homewood, Il.: The Dorsey Press. Nathan, K.S. & Mohammad Hashim Kamali. 2005. Islam in Southeast Asia. Singapore: ISEAS. Peretz, Don. 1986. The Middle East Today. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: the Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. (Cambridge University Press. Roy, Oliver. 1996. Gagalnya Islam Politik, terj. Harimurti dan Qamaruddin. Jakarta: PT. Serambi Ilmu Semesta. Varma, S.P. 1999. Teori Politik Modern. Cet.5. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Wahid, Marzuki dan Rumadi. 2001. Fiqh Madzhab Negara. Yogyakarta: LKiS. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This dissertation titled “The Policies of Authoritarian Regimes towards Political
Islam: A Case Study on Soeharto’s and Anwar Sadat’s Regimes” attempts to answer this
question: what policies towards Political Islam were adopted by Soeharto’s and Sadat’s
regimes and what are the similarities and differences between both of them as well as their
underlying factors? This dissertation is a library research with qualitative data using de-scriptive, interpretative, and analytical approaches based on the theory of policy. The poli-cies of both regimes are classified into two broad strategies, namely: first, the subjugation of
Political Islam’s power (through two modes: a. violence and marginalization; and b. propa-ganda and image politics); second, the accommodation of Political Islam (through two modes:
social and religious appeasement; and legislative policy appeasement). Those policies are
significantly of similar style and aim but different in terms of order and tactic of implementa-tion. In general, those policies are equally pragmatic and realistic for maximizing the regime’s
strength and gains and outrivaling all powers of Political Islam with view of achieving the
state’s political stability and avoiding the emergence of legitimacy crisis owing to domestic
situations. Therefore, the researcher refers to such policies as hegemonic regime’s domestic
political stability strategy. | en_US |
