| dc.identifier.citation | Adjemian, C. 1976. “On the Nature of Interlanguage System.” Language Learning. 26: 297— 320. Beebe, Leslie M. (Ed.) 1990. Issues in Second Language Acquisition: Multiple Perspectives. London: Newbury House. Bialystok, Ellen 1984. “Strategies in Interlanguage Learning and Performance.” In Davies A; C. Criper and A.P.R. Howatt. (Eds.) Interlanguage. Edinburgh: E.U.P. 1984. 37— 49. Bialystok, E. and Miller. B. 1999. “The Problem of Age in Second language Acquisition: Influences from Language, Structure, and Task”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2/2: 127—45. Bley-Vroman, Robert. 1990. “What is the Logical Problem of Foreign Language Learning.” In Gass, Susan and Schachter. 1990. Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P. 41—67 Corder, S. P. 1982. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. London: Oxford University Press. Corder, S. P. 1992. “ A Role for Mother Tongue” In S. Gass and L. Selinker (Eds.) Language Transfer in Language Learning (18—31). Amsterdam: John Benjamin. Dickerson, Lonna. 1975. “The learner’s Interlanguage as a System of Variable Rules”. TESOL Quarterly. 9/4: 401—407. Dulay, Burt, and Krashen. 1989. Language Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Grauberg, W. 1971. “An Error Analysis in German of First- Year University Students.” In G. Parren and J. Trim (Eds.) 1971: 257—263 Han, Zhaohong. 2004. Fossilization in Adult Second Language Acquisition. Toronto: Multilingual Matters. James, Carl. 1998. Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. London: Longman. Johnson, J.S. and Newport, E.L. 1989. “Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning: The Influence of Maturational State on the Acquisition of English as a Second Language. Cognitive Psychology 21, 60-99. Lenneberg, E.H. 1976. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley. Krashen, S.D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman. LoCoco, V. 1975. “An Analysis of Spanish and German Learners” Working Papers in Bilingualism. 7: 96—124. Mukattash, Lewis. 1987. “Persistence of Fossilization”. IRAL, 24/3: 187—203 Muranoi, Hitoshi. 2000. “Focus on Form through Interaction Enhancement: Integrating Formal Instruction into a Communicative Task in EFL Classrooms.” Language Learning, 50/ 4: 617—83. Saville-Troike, Muriel. 2006. Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P. Schachter, Jacquelyn. 1998. “Resent Research in Language in Language Learning Studies: Promise and Problems. Language Learning, 28/4: 557—583. Scovel, T. 1998. “A Critical Review of the Critical Period Research”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 13/1: 1—18. Selinker, Larry. 1997. Rediscovering Interlanguage. London: Longman Sorace, A. 1993. “Incomplete vs. Divergent Representations of Unaccusativity in Non-native Grammars of Italian. Second language Research. 9/1:22—27. Spada, Nina. And Lightbown, P. 1999. “Instruction, L1 Influence and Developmental Readiness in Second Language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83: 1—22. Steinberg, Danny D. 1998. An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. London: Longman Tarone, Elaine. 1983. “Some Thoughts of the Notion of Communication Strategy.” In Clause Faerch and Gabriele Kasper (Eds.) 1983: 61—74. Thep-Ackrapong, T. 1990. Fossilization: A Case Study of Practical and Theoretical Parameters (Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Illinois State University) in Han, ZhaoHong. 2004. Fossilization in Adult Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd Towell, Richard and Roger Hawkins. 1994. Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Adelaide: Multilingual Matters Ltd. White, Lidya. and Genesee, F. 1996. “How Native is Near native? The Issue of Ultimate Attainment in Adult Second Language Acquisition. Second Language Research. 12: 233—65. Yip, Virginia. 1995. Interlanguage and Learnability from Chinese to English. Amsterdam: John Benjamin B.V. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Kajian ini mengivestigasi efek pemulihan kesalahan pada kesalahan IL, khususnya
gramatika. Problem penelitian yang diajukan adalah “apa efek pemulihan kesalahan
pada kesahan gramatika pembelajar BA; apakah kesalahan gramatika bersifat
memfosil atau sebaliknya bersifat dinamis setelah pembelajar memperoleh intervensi
pemulihan kesalahan?. Data penelitian ini adalah karangan bebas yang dikumpulkan
sebanyak empat kali: sebelum, sesudah pemulihan kesalahan, dan dua bulan sesudahnya.
Data dianalisis secara kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Hasil analisis menunjukkan
bahwa pemulihan keslahan mampu merubah kondisi kesalahan gramatika. Mereka
cenderung menjadi dinamis. Pada satu kurun tertentu, kesalahan gramatika muncul; kemudian karena proses pemulihan kesalahan, sebagian kesalahan gramatika
menjadi tidak stabil, sebagian berfluktuasi, dan sebagian lainnya tetap stabil (tidak
goyah). Tipe kesalahan baru muncul saat pembelajar memasuki teritori baru
(menggunakan item gramatika baru). Kesimpulannya adalah pemulihan keslahan
dapat merubah kondisi kesalahan gramatika, yaitu mendorong terjadinya proses destabilisasi.
Kesalahan tertentu mungkin tidak goyah, namun hanya sementara saja.
Proses pemulihan kesalahan gramatika dapat diaplikasikan pada pembelajar yang
telah melewati masa kritis. Kesalahan gramatika bersifat dinamis sepanjang
pembelajar BA masih tetap dalam proses pembelajaran. | en_US |
