| dc.identifier.citation | Abdullah, Rozali., 2009. Mewujudkan Pemilu yang Lebih Berkualitas. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Afrosin, Arif, Respati., 2006. Mengawal Demokrasi. Dinamika Pilkada Kabupaten Grobogan. Surakarta. Indonesia: Iskra Publisher. Alfian., 1977. Pemikiran dan Perubahan Politik. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia. Anderson. Games E., 1979. Public Policy Making. Praeger Publisher. New York. Anonim., 2003. Lembaga Penyelenggaraan Pemilu di Indonesia. http://www.kpu.go.id Anonim., 2003. Himpunan Undang-undang Bidang Politik. Jakarta. Indonesia: KPU Press. Anugrah, Astrid., 2008. UU Parpol 2008 (UU No. 2 Tahun 2008) dan Keterwakilan Perempuan dalam Parpol. Jakarta: Penerbit Pancuran Alam. Arief, Sidharta., 1994. Teori Murni Tentang Hukum. Dalam Lili Rasjidi dan Arief Sidharta. Filsafat Hukum: Mazhab dan Refleksinya. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya. Attamimi, Hamid S., 1993. Hukum tentang Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Peraturan Kebijakan (Hukum Tata Pengaturan). Diucapkan dalam Pidato Purna Bakti Guru Besar Tetap Fakultas Hukum – UI, Depok. Badoh, Ibrahim Fahmy dan Luky Djani., 2006. Korupsi Pemilu. Jakarta: Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW). Bentham, Jeremy., 2010. Teori Perundang-undangan. Bandung: Nuansa dan Nusamedia, Terj. Bintan R. Saragih., 1997. Evaluasi Pemilu Orde Baru dalam Kumpulan Makalah dengan Judul Masyarakat dan Sistem Pemilu Indonesia. Bandung. Indonesia: Mizan. Bintoro, Tjokroamidjojo., 1991. Pengantar Administrasi Pembangunan. LP3ES. Jakarta. Braithwaite, J. G. Grootaert dan B. Milanovic., 2000. Poverty and Social Assistance in Transition Countries. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Campbell, T. G. Petersen dan J. Bazark., 1991. Decentralization to Local Government in LAC: National Strategies dan Local Response in Planning, Spending, and Management. LAC: Regional Studies Report 5. Latin America dan The Carribean Technical Department. World Bank. Washington D.C. Cruz, Peter de., 2010. Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit Nusa Media, Terj. Dye. R. Thomas., 1978. Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs. Prentice Hall Inc. New Jersey. Governance for Sustainable Human Development. The United Nations Development Programmed. Governance: Sound Development management. Asian Development Bank. 1995. Handoyo, B. Hestu Cipto., 2008. Prinsip-prinsip Legal Drafting & Desain Naskah Akademik. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya. Jones, Charles O., 1997. An Introduction to Study of Public Policy. Duxbury Press. Massachussets. Kelsen, Hans., 1973. General Theory of Law and State. Terjemahan andern Wedberg. New York. Russell & Russell. Kelsen, Hans., 2008. Teori Hukum Murni: Dasar-dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif. Bandung: Nusa Media, Terj. Magnis-Suseno, Franz., 2003. Etika Politik: Prinsip-prinsip Moral Dasar Kenegaraan Modern. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Marijan, Kacung., 2010. Sistem Politik Indonesia: Konsolidasi Demokrasi Pasca- Orde Baru. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. Milovanovic, Dragan., 1994. Sociology of Law. Harrow and Heston. New York. Narayan, D. et. al., 2000. Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear Us? (Vol. 1). New York. N.Y. publisher for the World Bank. Oxford University Press. Nonet, Philippe &Philip Selznick., 1978. Law and Society in Transition. Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper and Row. Nurhadiantomo., 2008. Masyarakat Majemuk, Transformasi Sosial dan Peranan Hukum. Surakarta: Program PKn-FKIP-Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (terbitan terbatas). ____________., Januari 1978. “Etika Komunikasi Politik: Perspektif Kampanye Pemilu dan Beberapa Implikasinya”, dalam Jurnal Akademik, No. 3, Tahun VI. Surakarta: Universitas Muahammadiyah Surakarta. Onny S. Prijono dan A.M.W. Pranarka. (ed)., 1996. Pemberdayaan Konsep Kebijakan dan Implementasi. CSIS. Jakarta. Partnership for Government Reform., 1999. Tata Pemerintahan yang Baik dari Kita untuk Kita. Jakarta. Ravallion M. dan B. Bidani., 1991. Measuring Changes in Poverty Profile. World Bank Economic Review. 5. Sardini, Nur Hidayat., 2011. Restorasi Penyelenggaraan Pemilu di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Fajar Media Press. Sigler. Jay. A. dan Benjamin R. Beede., 1977. The Legal Sources of Public Policy. D.C Heath and Company. Belmount. California. Soerjono, Soekanto., 1995. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raya Grafindo Persada. Jakarta. Supriyanto, Didik., 2007. Menjaga Independent Penyelenggaraan Pemilu. Jakarta: Perludem. Trikartono, Drajat., 2005. “Membaca Ulang Pemilu Tahun 2004”, dalam Dari Pilwan ke Pilpres: Laporan Pemilu 2004 di Surakarta. Surakarta: Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kota Surakarta. Trubek, David., 1972. Toward a Social Theory of Law: An Essay on the Study of Law and Development. The Yale Law Journal. Vol. 83. Number I. World Bank Institute and Parliamentary center., 1998. Parliamentary Accountability and Good Governance. A parliamentarian’s Handbook. Zetter, Lionel., 2008. Strategi Memenangkan Pilkada, Pemilu, & Pilpres. Jakarta: PT. Ina Publikatama. Undang-undang UU No. 12 Tahun 2003 tentang Pemilihan Umum Anggota DPR, DPD, DPRD. UU No. 10 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilihan Umum Anggota DPR, DPD, DPRD. UU No. 23 Tahun 2003 tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden. UU No. 22 Tahun 2007 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum. UU No. 2 Tahun 2008 tentang Partai Politik. UU No. 2 Tahun 2011 tentang Partai Politik. UU No. 12 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The political system that is used in this reform era, tend to be called as
democratized-participatory political system. Participation which mentioned here
includes political participation in the processes of planning, taking, implementing,
and monitoring of decisions or policies. Public participation may form as
acceptance, acceptance with conditions, support, rejection, or giving alternative.
The implementation of General Election in this reform era, which consists of
Regional Head Election, Legislative Elections and the Presidential Election, were
a decision-making processes through voting with a very large scale, which is
called the democracy party.
The reduced degree of participation in the 2004’s General Elections and
2009’s General Elections, both Presidential Elections and Legislative Elections,
because of two factors, first, saturation and second, apathy. Public, especially
voters felt bored, because of there were a lot of governance elections directly, with
the same pattern, since the “Pilkades”, Regional Head Elections (governors,
regents, and mayors), Legislative Elections, and the Presidential Election. The
emergence of voter apathy in the community especially, because some voters
thought that the existing election system has not been able to create a pattern of
leadership in accordance with the aspirations of the people. They acknowledged
that direct General Elections are efforts to improve the appearance of leadership,
in accordance with the aspirations of the people, but in the reality have not been
able to run optimally. Patterns of leadership in accordance with the aspirations of
the people, was the leadership that can protect and improve the life of its people,
including community economic empowerment. The reduced degree of
participation in elections means increasing the number (percentage) of “Golput”
(non-voting).
Therefore, the public wants a change in the General Election system, so,
the process and the effect of the General Election implementation is more
efficient-to-use, in realizing the life of the nation-state that is democraticparticipatory.
Therefore, the public desired a General Election format, which is
the separation of the National General Elections (Central) and Regional General
Elections. The National General Election is a combination of the Central
Legislative Elections (DPR and DPD) and the Presidential Election. Regional
General Elections is a combination of Legislative Elections (DPRD province,
district, and city) and the Regional Executive Election (governors, regents,
mayors). National General Elections held first and then followed by the Regional
General Election with a two-year time span. Those two years, were used for the
preparation of the next General Election, evaluates the results of the General
Elections which are already running, and reduce the saturation level of the public. | en_US |
