| dc.identifier.citation | Alford R.L. & Strother J.B. 1990. “Attitudes of Native and Nonnative Speakers Toward Selected Regional Accents of U.S. English” in TESOL QUARTELY Vol. 24. No. 3. Autumn 1990. Clark, John &Yallop, Colin. 1995. An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers,Inc. Edi Subroto. 1993. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Linguistik. Surakarta: UNS Press. Hepy Adityarini. 2003. The IntelligiBIlity to Native English Speakers of Interdental Sounds Articulated by Javanese Speakers. (The Unpublised Research Work). Jones, Daniel. 1956. English Pronouncing Dictionary. London: The Aldine Press. Letchworth -Herts. Jones, Daniel. 1983. An Outline of English Phonetics. London: Cambridge University Press. Kantner, E. Claude and West, Robert. 1960. Phonetics: An Introduction to the Principles of Phonetic Science from the Point of View of English Speech. New York: Harper & Brothers. Katamba. 1989. An Introduction to Phonology. London: Longman. Matsuura, Hiroko, 2007. “Intelligibility and Individual Learner Differences in the EIL Context”. SCIENCE DIRECT-SYSTEM. Jurnal Volume 35, Issue 3. September 2007. P. 293-304. Kartomihardjo, Suseno. 1988. Bahasa Cermin Kehidupan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Depdikbud. Lass, Roger. 1984. Fonologi (Terj. Warsono, dkk.). Cambridge: CUP. Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T.M. 1995. “Foreign Accent, Comprehensibility, and Intelligibility in the Speech of Second Language Learners”, 45, 73-97. Kelly, Gerald. 2000. How to Teach Pronunciation. England: Pearson Education Limited. Lane, Linda. 2005. Focus on Pronunciation 2. New York: Longman. Lane, Linda. 2005. Focus on Pronunciation 3. New York: Longman.Major C. Roy. 2000. “The Effect of Nonnative Accents on Listening Comprehension: Implications for ESL Assessment” (artikel) dalam TESOL QUARTERLY Volume 36, Number 2. Summer 2000. Pike, Kenneth. Phonemics: A Technique for Reducing Languaes to Writing. Prince, S. Moneta. 1989. “A Note on Vowel Perception” in TEFLIN Journal Volume 2 February. 1989. Roach, Peter. 1991. English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Scane, A. Sanford. 1973. Generative Phonology. London: Prentice-Hall International Inc. Shockey, Linda. 2003. Sounds Patterns of Spoken English. Oxford: Blackwell PublishingLtd. Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press. Walfram, Walt and Johnson, Robert. 1981. Phonological Analysis Focus on American English. ColumBIa: University of District of ColumBIa. Walker, Robin. 2001. “Pronunciation for International Intelligibility”. http://www3.telus.net/linguisticsissues/internationalintelligibility.html Wiwid Handayani Setyaningrum. 2005. Javanese Interference on English Pronunciation of the Fifth Semester English Department Students of UMS, Academic Year 2004/2005. Research Paper S1 (Unpublished). “Speech Quality and Evaluation” (a chapter from a Master Thesis) http://www.acoustics.hut.fi/publications/files/theses/lemmetty_mst/chpt10.html | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The quality of pronouncing English sounds by Javanese Learners of English (JLE) is much
influenced by their way of speaking of their native language. The study aims to examine why
Javanese English (JE) variation is to occur in JLE when producing the English sounds. The
data are JLE’s speech of English in the context of words, phrases, and sentences which are
collected by means of recording, testing and participant interview. The data analysis applies
techniques of comparison and contrast _between RP and JLE pronunciation_ in the domain
of impressionistic articulatory phonetics which is assisted by using Audio Edit Magic (AEM).
The result shows that JLE produced JE because of knowing lack of Phonology and Phonetics,
being interferenced of spelling, being confused of pronunciation in homographs or dual role
words and tongue-twister, and being lack of knowing suprasegmental features. Moreover, JE
can be performed as having the characteristics in the lack of maximal force or to be lenis and
unaspirated in JLE’s producing stops, so the case of voicing is not well differentiated. JE is
also characterized as having the sound [th, nd, t] for voiceless interdental, voiced
interdental, and flap respectively. In the meantime, JE diphtongs are focussed only in the
nucleus to pronounce than its combination with the gliding, so that this results in
differentiating the quality of producing the adjacent vowel sounds. | en_US |
