| dc.identifier.citation | Abu, R. B. dan Flowers, J. 1997. The Effects of Cooperative Learning Methods on Achievement, Retention, and Attitudes of Home Economics Students in North California. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education. Vol. 13. No. 2. pp. 47-56. Adesoji, F.A dan Ibraheem, T.A. 2009. Effects of Student Teams Achievement Divisions Strategy and Mathematics Knowledge on Learning Outcomes in Chemical Kinetics. The Journal of International Social Research. Vol. 2/6. Winter. pp. 15-25. Agus Suprijono. 2009. Cooperative Learning: Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar. Anita Lie. 2002. Mempraktekkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang-ruang Kelas. Jakarta: Grasindo.Balfakih, Nagib M.A. 2003. The Effectiveness of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) for Teaching High School Chemistry in The United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Science Education. Vol. 25. No. 5. pp. 605-624. Bostic, Jeff Q. 1988. Cognitive Styles: Their Consolidation and Relationship, Beyond Cognitive Developmental Level and Critical Thinking Ability, to Understanding Science. Dissertation. Texas: Texas Tech University. Budiyono. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press. . 2009. Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press. Carss, Wendy Diane. 2007. The Effects of Using Think-Pair-Share During Guided Reading Lessons. Thesis. Waikato: The University of Waikato. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2005. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. Desmita. 2009. Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Erman Suherman. 2001. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: JICA-UPI. Henry Suryo Bintoro. 2010. Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TPS pada Materi Pokok Fungsi Ditinjau dari Kreativitas Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kota Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2009/2010. Tesis. Surakarta: Univeristas Sebelas Maret. Ika Krisdiana. 2009. Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD (Student Teams Achievement Divisions) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau dari Aktivitas Belajar Peserta Didik pada Pokok Bahasan Persamaan dan Fungsi Kuadrat Kelas X SMA di Kota Madiun. Tesis. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret. Maasz, J. 2005. A New View of Mathematics Will Help Mathematics Teachers. Adults Learning Mathematics International Journal. Vol. 1 (1). pp. 6–18. Purwoto. 2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Mengajar. Surakarta: UNS Press. Rini Susilowati. 2011. Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisons (STAD) dan Think-Pair-Share (TPS) pada Pokok Bahasan Relasi dan Fungsi Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Sukoharjo. Tesis. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret. Sadirman A.M. 2001. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada. Saifuddin Azwar. 2000. Tes Prestasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Slavin. 2008. Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset, dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media. Sutratinah Tirtonegoro. 1984. Anak Supernormal dan Program Pendidikannya. Jakarta: Bina Aksara. Syaiful Bahri Djamarah. 1994. Prestasi Belajar dan Kompetensi Guru. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional. Tabrani. 1991. Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remadja Karya. W.S. Winkel. 1996. Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Grasindo. Yatim Riyanto. 2010. Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana. Zakaria, E., Iksan, Z. 2007. Promoting Cooperative Learning in Science and Mathematics Education: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Vol. 3(1). pp. 35-39. Zakaria, E., Chin. L. C., Daud, M. Y. 2010. The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Mathematics Achievement and Attitude towards Mathematics. Journal of Social Science. Vol. 6 (2). pp. 272-275. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The aims of this research are to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model. The
research is quasi experimental with 1 × 3 factorial design. The population is all students of grade VIII State
Junior High School in Blora Regency on the odd semester of 2011/2012 academic years. Sampling was done by
stratified cluster random sampling technique. The total of sample is 330 students. Instruments used to collect
data are prior knowledge tes and mathematics achievement test. The trial of instrument test includes of content
validity, dificullty level, discrimination power, and reliability. Precondition tests includes normality test uses
Lilliefors method and homogenity of variance test uses Bartlett method. Balance test uses one way analyss of
variance with unequal cells. The hypothesis test uses one ways analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on
hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: The cooperative learning model of STAD type gives a better
mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of TPS type and conventional learning model, and
the cooperative learning model of TPS type gives a better mathematics achievement than conventional learning
model. | en_US |
