| dc.identifier.citation | Bessong, F.E, and Felix Ojong. 2012. Supervision as in Instrument of TeachingLearning Effectivenes: Chalengge for The Nigerian Practice. Global Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 8 (1 and 2). pp. 15-20 Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. 2007. Education Research: An Introduction. New YorkLondon: Longman. Inc. Cicih Sutarsih & Nurdin. 2012. Supervisi Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta. Day, C. and Judyth Sachs. 2004. International Handbook on the Continuing Professional Development of Teachers. Open University Press. Glasgow. Debling, G. 1995. “The Employment Department Training Agency Standarts Program: Implications for Education”, dalam Burke, J.W. (Ed).Competency Based Education and training. London-New York-Philadelphia: The Farmer Press.pp. 77-94. Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan, Ditjen MPMTK Depdiknas. 2007. Laporan Uji Kompetensi Guru Nasional Tahun 2006. Jakarta: Proyek BERMUTU, Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru. Fritz, Cariie. 2003. Supervisory Options for Instructional Leader in Education. Journal of Leadership Education. Vol. 2 (2). pp. 13-27. Guskey, T. 2000. Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Jones, James J. dan Walters, Donald L. 2008. Human Resources Management in Education (Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia ). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Q – Media. Mathis, Robert L. dan Jackson, John H. 200). Human Resources Management (Manajemen Sumber Daya manusia). Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat. Neagley, Ross & Dean Evan. 1980 dalam Cicih Sutarsih dan Nurdin.2012. Supervisi Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta. Samino. 2009. Pengantar Manajemen Pendidikan. Sukoharjo: Fairuz Media Samsudi. 2009. Disain Penelitian Pendidikan. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang Press. Saud, Udin Saefudin. 2009. PengembanganProfesi Guru.Penerbit: Alfabeta, Bandung. Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Tayibnapis, Farida Y. 2008. Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Jakarta : PT. Rineka Cipta. ———————. 2005. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005. Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: Depdiknas. ———————. 2008. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 74 Tahun 2008.Guru. Jakarta: Depdiknas. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Act No. 14/ 2005 about Teachers and Lecturers and PP (Government
Decree) No 74/2008 about Teachers give an instruction to the government
to certify on-going-occupation teachers of all courses in requirements. Based on
the survey of Directorate General of PMPTK in 2009/, however, the program of
certification couldn’t have developed teachers’ competency and professionalism
significantly so that it does not positively take an effect on teachers’ performance
development. The study aims to describe a model of biology teachers’ professional
competency development based on the early competency test (UKA) in Surakarta.
The procedure of research development used R & D model developed by Borg &
Gall (2007), and then simplified by Samsudi (2009; 92) into three main stage: 1)
introduction, 2) development, and 3) validation for finding a model. The introduction
of the study empirically analyzed a model of professional competency development
through Biology MGMP, called as factual model nowadays and theoretically
analyzed the relevant researchers. It employed a survey approach while the
instrument was questionnaires. The respondents or informants with purposive
sampling were the heads of LPMP – Provincial Central Java, Education Agency of
Regency/Mayor, Principals, the Committees of Biology MGMP, and Biology
Teachers. In the stage of development, the researcher formulated an early
development; then it was analyzed and matched with the relevant theories for
making a model design developed in the form of Figure or Model Figure after
validated through focus group discussion (FGD). The results of the study stated
that a model of biology teachers’ professional competency based on the early
competency test included the following characters: 1) implementing a model began
with a competency test; 2) the activities reflected the aspect of continuing
professional development (CDP); 3) the supervision was periodically realized by
principals or course teachers); 4) giving feed-back for the next development was
based on the evaluation; and 5) the speakers of Higher Education with relevant
sciences were involved in the activities. | en_US |
