Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAminah, Aminah
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-15T02:39:11Z
dc.date.available2015-01-15T02:39:11Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationArikunto, Suharsimi, 1991. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Barata, Atep Adya. 1999. Perpajakan SMK JIlid I. Bandung : CV. Armico. Brotodiharjo, R. Santoso.1993. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Pajak, Bandung: PT. Eresco. Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. 2000. Guru dan Anak didik dalam Interaktif Edukatif. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta. Madya, Suwarsih. 2007. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Direktorat Profesi Pendidik Ditjen PMPTK. Penyusun Widya Iswara Jurusan Akuntansi. 2006. Mengelola Administrasi Pajak. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Porter, Bobby De. dkk. 2000. Quantum Teaching. Bandung : Kaifa. Sumitro, Rachmat. 1990. Dasar-dasar Hukum Pajak dan Pajak Pendapatan. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Syah, Muhibbin. 2007. Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Tim Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2001. Pedoman Teknis Pelaksanaan Classroom Action Research (CAR). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1412-3835
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/5071
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the research is to minimize the errors that occur during a class XI student of Accounting 1 semester 3 to solve the problems of taxation, and improve student achievement in taxation lesson. This research used a classroom model of action research Kurt Lewin procedures that consists of several cycles, and each cycle consists of four stages: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. Subjects research were 39 students of Class II Accounting 1 Semester 3 SMK Negeri 1 Pati. Instruments used are observation sheets, assessment sheets, questionnaires, and attitude scale. Data analysis technique used to compare the results of a qualitative descriptive action in the first cycle to the second cycle, and the assessment results of student questionnaire using the percentage formula. Assessment of attitudes in group discussions, including: (A) the activity of 76.92%, (B) 76.07% cooperation, (C) Sharing 77.78%, (D) presentation of 78.63%, and (e) the results of the task 83.76%, increase significantly. Indicators of success of 75% has been achieved. Concluded group discussion has improved, student achievement shown by the average grade 77.69 became 82.10 pre-cycle in the first cycle and 95, 33 on the second cycle. Judging from the average grade achievement indicator exceeds 75. All students, 100% has been declared completed study with the value obtained above 75.en_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartaen_US
dc.subjectgroup discussionsen_US
dc.subjecttaxationen_US
dc.titlePenerapan Diskusi Kelompok pada Mata Pelajaran Perpajakan untuk Meminimalkan Kesalahan Siswa Kelas XI Akuntansi 1 Semester 3 SMK Negeri 1 Patien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record