dc.contributor.author | Rahmawati, Laili Etika | |
dc.contributor.author | Pratiwi, Dini Restiyanti | |
dc.contributor.author | Saifudin, M. Fakhrur | |
dc.contributor.author | Arifin, Zainal | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-02-03T03:54:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-02-03T03:54:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-01-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Arifin, Zainal. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Depdiknas. 2005. Peratuan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Eid, Karim Ghada. 2005. The Effects of Sample Size on the Equating of Test Items. Proquest Journals. Vol. 126, Iss.1; pg. 165, 16 pgs diunduh tanggal 22 Januari 2009. Haryati, mimin. 2008. Model dan Teknik Penilaian pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press. Hayslip, Josephine B. dan Zark VanZandt. 2000. “Using National Standards and Models of Excellence as Frameworks for Accountability”, sagepub.com. USA: http://jcd.sagepub.com. Diunduh pada tanggal 23 April 2009. Hidayatullah, Furqon. 2010. Pendidikan Karakter: Membangun Peradaban Bangsa. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka. McDaniel, Mark A., Roediger, Henry L., dan McDermott, Kathleen B. 2007. Generalizing Test-Enhanced Learning from the Laboratory to the Classroom. Proquest Journals. Vol. 14, Iss. 2; pg. 200, 7 pgs. Diunduh tanggal 22 Januari 2009. Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2001. Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: BPFE. ___________________. 2010. Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Kompetensi. Yogyakarta: BPFE. ___________________. 2011. Penilaian Otentik dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. Olds, Phillip R. dan Crumbley, D. Larry. 2003. Higher Grades = Higher Evaluations: Impression Management of Students. Proquest Journals. Vol. 11, Iss. 3; pg. 172, 6 pgs diakses tanggal 22 Januari 2009 Purwanto, M. Ngalim. 2010. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Sabardila,Atiqa, Markhamah dan Elinawati. 2011. “Pemetaan Butir Soal Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Ketercapaian Tujuan Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Colomadu”. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora. Vol 12 (2) hal 146-156. Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Bandung: Rosdakarya. Widoyoko, Eko Putro. 2011. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2407-9189 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/5150 | |
dc.description.abstract | The research has aim to describe the pattern of modification and composition of Bahasa
Indonesia Test Instrument of National Examination of Junior High School in academic year
2012/ 2013. The method used in the research was qualitative descriptive research by analitical
method. The data used were twenty test instruments package of Bahasa Indonesia of National
Examination of Junior High School in academic year 2012/ 2013. Based on the research data
type, the collecting data were conducted by the technique of documentation. The documentation
process was conducted by analyzing the twenty packages of test instrument of Bahasa Indonesia
National Examination to determine the number of the texts used in twenty packages of the test
instrument. After the texts had finished to be mapped, the researchers analyzed the pattern of
modification and composition of Bahasa Indonesia test instrument of National Examination of
Junior High School in academic year 2012/ 2013. The technique of data analyze were using the
content or document analysis which aim to know the meaning, position and the relation
between the various concepts in order to know the advantages, result, or the effects appeared.
The testing of data validity will be conducted by the discussion with the peers. Based on the
results of data analysis conducted, it can be concluded that the results of the research were: (1)
the pattern of modification of Bahasa Indonesia test instrument of National Examination of
Junior High School in academic year 2012/2013 was conducted by randomly by combining
some texts with the same questions in every test instrument. However, there are some tests
instrument which are not modified from the different texts, in other words, it only based on one
text, they are the test instruments number 26, 32, 38, 39,and 42. Nevertheless, the test
instruments number 19, 20, 24, 30, 31, 40, 49, 50 were modified from the seven different texts,
and other than those which has already mentioned above were modified from the eight different
text; (2) the composition of Bahasa Indonesia test instrument of National Examination of Junior
High School in academic year 2012/2013 showed that there were no composition balancing
which developed of Bahasa Indonesia test instrument of National Examination of Junior High
School. From the comparison between the competence standard of language and literary, it
showed the number 72%: 28% as the comparison. It could be known that the test instrument
developed by the literary competence standard was still low in number. From the comparison
between the language and the literary skill, it could be known that the skill comparison of
listening, speaking, reading and writing were 0%:8%:50%:42%. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta | en_US |
dc.subject | pattern of modofication | en_US |
dc.subject | composition | en_US |
dc.subject | bahasa Indonesia test instrument | en_US |
dc.subject | National Examination | en_US |
dc.title | Pola Modifikasi dan Komposisi Soal Ujian Nasional Bahasa Indonesia SMP Tahun Pelajaran 2012/ 2013 | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |