Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRahmawati, Laili Etika
dc.contributor.authorPratiwi, Dini Restiyanti
dc.contributor.authorSaifudin, M. Fakhrur
dc.contributor.authorArifin, Zainal
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-03T03:54:33Z
dc.date.available2015-02-03T03:54:33Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-24
dc.identifier.citationArifin, Zainal. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Depdiknas. 2005. Peratuan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Eid, Karim Ghada. 2005. The Effects of Sample Size on the Equating of Test Items. Proquest Journals. Vol. 126, Iss.1; pg. 165, 16 pgs diunduh tanggal 22 Januari 2009. Haryati, mimin. 2008. Model dan Teknik Penilaian pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press. Hayslip, Josephine B. dan Zark VanZandt. 2000. “Using National Standards and Models of Excellence as Frameworks for Accountability”, sagepub.com. USA: http://jcd.sagepub.com. Diunduh pada tanggal 23 April 2009. Hidayatullah, Furqon. 2010. Pendidikan Karakter: Membangun Peradaban Bangsa. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka. McDaniel, Mark A., Roediger, Henry L., dan McDermott, Kathleen B. 2007. Generalizing Test-Enhanced Learning from the Laboratory to the Classroom. Proquest Journals. Vol. 14, Iss. 2; pg. 200, 7 pgs. Diunduh tanggal 22 Januari 2009. Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2001. Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: BPFE. ___________________. 2010. Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Kompetensi. Yogyakarta: BPFE. ___________________. 2011. Penilaian Otentik dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. Olds, Phillip R. dan Crumbley, D. Larry. 2003. Higher Grades = Higher Evaluations: Impression Management of Students. Proquest Journals. Vol. 11, Iss. 3; pg. 172, 6 pgs diakses tanggal 22 Januari 2009 Purwanto, M. Ngalim. 2010. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Sabardila,Atiqa, Markhamah dan Elinawati. 2011. “Pemetaan Butir Soal Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Ketercapaian Tujuan Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Colomadu”. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora. Vol 12 (2) hal 146-156. Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Bandung: Rosdakarya. Widoyoko, Eko Putro. 2011. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2407-9189
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/5150
dc.description.abstractThe research has aim to describe the pattern of modification and composition of Bahasa Indonesia Test Instrument of National Examination of Junior High School in academic year 2012/ 2013. The method used in the research was qualitative descriptive research by analitical method. The data used were twenty test instruments package of Bahasa Indonesia of National Examination of Junior High School in academic year 2012/ 2013. Based on the research data type, the collecting data were conducted by the technique of documentation. The documentation process was conducted by analyzing the twenty packages of test instrument of Bahasa Indonesia National Examination to determine the number of the texts used in twenty packages of the test instrument. After the texts had finished to be mapped, the researchers analyzed the pattern of modification and composition of Bahasa Indonesia test instrument of National Examination of Junior High School in academic year 2012/ 2013. The technique of data analyze were using the content or document analysis which aim to know the meaning, position and the relation between the various concepts in order to know the advantages, result, or the effects appeared. The testing of data validity will be conducted by the discussion with the peers. Based on the results of data analysis conducted, it can be concluded that the results of the research were: (1) the pattern of modification of Bahasa Indonesia test instrument of National Examination of Junior High School in academic year 2012/2013 was conducted by randomly by combining some texts with the same questions in every test instrument. However, there are some tests instrument which are not modified from the different texts, in other words, it only based on one text, they are the test instruments number 26, 32, 38, 39,and 42. Nevertheless, the test instruments number 19, 20, 24, 30, 31, 40, 49, 50 were modified from the seven different texts, and other than those which has already mentioned above were modified from the eight different text; (2) the composition of Bahasa Indonesia test instrument of National Examination of Junior High School in academic year 2012/2013 showed that there were no composition balancing which developed of Bahasa Indonesia test instrument of National Examination of Junior High School. From the comparison between the competence standard of language and literary, it showed the number 72%: 28% as the comparison. It could be known that the test instrument developed by the literary competence standard was still low in number. From the comparison between the language and the literary skill, it could be known that the skill comparison of listening, speaking, reading and writing were 0%:8%:50%:42%.en_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartaen_US
dc.subjectpattern of modoficationen_US
dc.subjectcompositionen_US
dc.subjectbahasa Indonesia test instrumenten_US
dc.subjectNational Examinationen_US
dc.titlePola Modifikasi dan Komposisi Soal Ujian Nasional Bahasa Indonesia SMP Tahun Pelajaran 2012/ 2013en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record