| dc.identifier.citation | APA, AERA, & NCME. (1999). Standard for educational and psychological testing. Washington, CD: American Psychological Association. Bauer, D. J. (2005). The Role of Nonlinear Factor-to-Indicator Relationships in Tests of Measurement Equivalence. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 305-316. Beaujean, A. A., McGlaughlin, S. M., & Margulies, A. S. (2009). Factorial Validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales for Referred Students. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 932-950. Booth, T., Irwing, P., & Booth, T. (2011). Sex differences in the 16PF5, test of measurement invariance and mean differences in the US standardisation sample. Personality & Individual Differences, 50(5), 553-558. Bowden, S. C., Saklofske, D. H., & Weiss, L. G. (2011). Intelligence Scale-IV in the United States and Canada Invariance of the Measurement Model Underlying the Wechsler Adult. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(1), 186–199. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: The Guilford Press. Cai, L., Yang, J. S., & Hansen, M. (2011). Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis. Psychological Methods. doi: 10.1037/a0023350 Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct Validity in Psychological Tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302. Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for Factorial Invariance in the Context of Construct Validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121-149. Embretson, S. E. (2007). Construct Validity: A Universal Validity System or Just Another Test Evaluation Procedure? Educational Researcher, 36(8), 449-455. ETS. (2002). ETS Standards for Quality and Fairness. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Flowers, C. P., Raju, N. S., & Oshima, T. C. (2002). A Comparison Measurement Equivalence Methods Based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory. Paper dipresentasikan pada Annual Meeting of the National Concil on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA. Gorin, J. S. (2007). Reconsidering Issues in Validity Theory. Educational Researcher, 36(8), 456–462. Immekus, J. C., & Maller, S. J. (2010). Factor Structure Invariance of the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test across Male and Female Samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(1), 91-104. Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2010). The Effect of Among-Group Dependence on the Invariance Likelihood Ratio Test. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(3), 464–480. Jöreskog, K. G. (2007). Factor Analysis and Its Extensions. Dalam R. Cudeck & R. C. MacCallum (Eds.), Factor analysis at 100: historical developments and future directions (hh. 47-77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers. Liu, Y., & Thissen, D. (2012). Identifying Local Dependence With a Score Test Statistic Based on the Bifactor Logistic Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(8), 670-688. doi: 10.1177/0146621612458174 Maydeu-Olivares, A., Hernández, A., & McDonald, R. P. (2006). A Multidimensional Ideal Point Item Response Theory Model for Binary Data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(4), 445–471. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. McDonald, R. P. (2000). A Basis for Multidimensional Item Response Theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(2), 99–114. Molenaar, P. C. M. (2009). Commentary on "Idiographic Filters for Psychological Constructs". Measurement, 7(1), 13-16. Naga, D. S. (2004). Ketidaktepatan Penggunaan Validitas Butir dan Koefisien Reliabilitas dalam Penelitian Pendidikan dan Psikologi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 11(2). Nair, R. L., White, R. M. B., Knight, G. P., & Roosa, M. W. (2009). Cross-Language Measurement Equivalence of Parenting Measures for Use With Mexican American Populations. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(5), 680–689. Ployhart, R. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2004). Applications of Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis: Integrating Correlational and Experimental Approaches. Organizational Research Methods, 7(1), 27-65. Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and Structural Coefficient Bias in Structural Equation Modeling: A Bifactor Perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5-26. doi: 10.1177/0013164412449831 Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory: Two Approaches for Exploring Measurement Invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 552-566. Reniers, R. L. E. P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Völlm, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84-95. Rotgans, J., & Schmidt, H. (2009). Examination of the Context-Specific Nature of Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Studies, 35(3), 239-253. Sireci, S. G. (2007). On Validity Theory and Test Validation. Educational Researcher, 36(8), 477–481. South, S. C., Krueger, R. F., & Iacono, W. G. (2009). Factorial Invariance of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale across Gender. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 622-628. Vandenberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a Further Understanding of and Improvement in Measurement Invariance Methods and Procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5(2), 139-158. Whittaker, T. A., Chang, W., & Dodd, B. G. (2012). The Performance of IRT Model Selection Methods With Mixed-Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(3), 159-180. doi: 10.1177/0146621612440305 Yao, L. (2010). BMIRT: Bayesian multivariate item response theory. [Computer Software]. Monterey, CA: Defense Manpower Data Center. Yao, L., & Li, F. (2010). A DIF Detection Procedure in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Framework and its Applications. Paper dipresentasikan pada Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Colorado, Denver. | in_ID |
