Show simple item record

Determinan Surat Utang Negara (SUN) dengan Pendekatan ECM

dc.contributor.authorSoebagiyo, Daryono
dc.contributor.authorPanjawa, Jihad Lukis
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-24T07:15:53Z
dc.date.available2016-02-24T07:15:53Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-13
dc.identifier.citationAng, Robbert. 1997. Pasar Modal Indonesia. Jakarta: Mediasoft Indonesia. Chee, S.W. dan Cheng F.F. 2013. “Macroeconomic Determinants of UK Treasury Bonds Spread”. International Journal of Arts and Commerce. Vol.2 (1). Fabozzi, Frank J. 2000. “Bond Markets, Analysis and Strategies”. Fourth Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Greene, William H (2003), Econometric Analysis. Fifth edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Gujarati Damodar N, 2003, Basic Econometrics, Fourth Edition, International Edition, McGraw Hill, New York. Gujarati Damodar N, 2006, Essentials of Econometrics, Third Edition, McGraw Hill International Edition, New York. Gujarati, Damodar N. 2007. “Dasar-dasar Ekonometrika”, (3rd ed). Terjemahan oleh Julius A. Mulyadi. Jakarta : Erlangga Hartono, Jogiyanto. 1998. Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM. Haldane Andrew.G, Nicolette Battini, 1998, Forward Looking Rules For Monetary Policy, Working paper 6543, National Bureau of Economic Reseach, Cambridge. http://www.Bapepam.go.id http://www.bi.go.id http://www.ibpa.co.id http://www.idx.co.id Husaini dan Saiful. 2003. “Pengaruh Penerbitan Obligasi Terhadap Risiko dan Return Saham”, Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis. Vol. 5 (1): 35-46. Husnan, Suad. 2009. Dasar-dasar Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Sekuritas Edisi Keempat. Yogyakarta: Unit Penerbit dan Percetakan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN. Indarsih, Nanik. 2013. “Pengaruh Tingkat Suku Bunga SBI, Rating, Likuiditas dan Maturitas Terhadap Yield To Maturity Obligasi”. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen. Vol. 1 (1): `125-136. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. 2015. Posisi Utang Pemerintah Pusat. Diakses pada 8 Januari 2016, http://www.djppr.kemenkeu.go.id/page/l oad/23. Mankiw, N. Gregory. 2000. Teori Makroekonomi Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. Putri, Eka Lestari Hafqi. 2013. “Pengaruh Risiko Likuiditas Perusahaan Terhadap Yield Speard Obligasi”. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis.Vol. XXIII (3): 294-306. Rahardjo, Sapto. 2003. Panduan Investasi Obligasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Santoso, Indra D. 1997. Kiat Investasi di Pasar Modal. Jakarta: Megapoin. Samsul, Mohamad. 2006. Pasar Modal dan Manajemen Portofolio. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. Sitorus, Tarmiden. 2015. Pasar Obligasi Indonesia: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Soebagiyo Daryono, 2002, Deficit Spending dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pendapatan Nasional dan Inflasi, Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan 2002 (vol 3 no 1, 46-54), BPPE - FE UMS, Surakarta. Soebagiyo Daryono, 2005, Defisit Spending and Economics Growth in Indonesia, International Seminar, Empowering Economy and Business in Free Trade Era, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia and Muhammadiyah Unversity of Surakarta. Surakarta Soebagiyo Daryono, 2012, Analisis Pembiayaan Defisit Anggaran di Indonesia, Disertasi S3 ( Tidak Dipublikasikan) PDIE Universitas Brawijaya Malang Soebagiyo Daryono, 2012, Isu Strategi Defisit Spending di Indonesia, Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Volume 13, Nomor 2, Desember 2012, hlm.260-275. BPPE FEB Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Subagia, I Ketut dan Ida Bagus Panji Sedana. 2015. “Analisis Pengaruh Likuiditas, Waktu Jatuh Tempo Dan Kupon Obligasi Terhadap Perubahan Harga Obligasi Korporasi Di Bursa Efek Indonesia”. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud. Volume 4 (5): 1451-1465. Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal. Undang-undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2002 tentang Surat Utang Negara. Widajati, Asih. 2009. “Inflasi dan Tingkat Bunga Terhadap Harga Obligasi Negara Ritel yang Diterbitkan Pemerintah”. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan Vol. 13 (1): 97–105. Yuan, Kathy. 2001. “The Liquidity Service of Sovereign Bonds”, Working Paper, didownload dari www.papers.ssrn.com.in_ID
dc.identifier.issn2407-9189
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/6712
dc.description.abstractFluctuating economic situation becomes an important indicator for investors in making investment decisions. Because as an investor would act on minimum risk in order to obtain the expected profit. This study aimed to analyze the effect of liquidity bonds, tenor and birate against government securities. Data types used are times series from 2008: 4-2014: 4. To determine the influence of both short term and long term, the analytical methods used in this study is the error correction model (ECM). The results showed a partial short-term liquidity tenor bonds and significant positive effect on state bonds, while birate significant negative effect. In the long term partial liquidity bonds, tenor and birate significant negative effect on sovereign debt. Simultaneously, liquidity of bonds, tenor and birate effect on sovereign debt.in_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherLPPM STIKES Muhammadiyah Kudusin_ID
dc.subjectLiquidity Bondsin_ID
dc.subjectTenorin_ID
dc.subjectBiratein_ID
dc.subjectGovernment Securitiesin_ID
dc.titleDeterminan Surat Utang Negara (SUN) dengan Pendekatan ECMin_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
5. Daryono Soebagyo, Jihad Lukis ...
Size:
88.47Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record