| dc.identifier.citation | Altman M, Bonamy A-KE, Wikstrom A- K, Cnattingius S. Cause-specific infant mortality in a population- based Swedish study of contribution of gestational age and birth weight. BMJ. 2012;12:2. Ziyo FY, Matly FA, Mehemd GM, Dofany EM. Relation between prenatal care and pregnancy outcome at Benghazi Sudanese Journal of public Health. 2009;4:4. Deb P, G.Sosa-Rubi S. Does onset or qualiti of prenatal care matter more for infant health? New York: University of New York2005. Kakogawa J, MiyukiSadatsuki, Ogaki Y, Nakanishi M, Minoura S. Effect of social service prenatal care utilization on perinatal outcome among women with socioeconomic problems in Tokyo Metropolitan Area International Scholary Research Network. [Clinical Study ]. 2011;2011:6. Rouselle F. Lavado LPL, Valerie Gilbert T. Ulep, and Lester M. Tan. Who provides good quality prenatal care in the Philippines? Philippine2010. Kupek E, Petrou S, Vause S, Maresh M. Clinical, provider and sociodemographic predictor of late initiation of antenatal in England and Wales. BJOG: an International of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;109:265-73. Sinha S. Outcome of antenatal care in urban Slum of Delhi Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2006;31:3. Grjibovski A, Bygren LO, Svartbo B. Socio-demographic determinants of poor infant outcome in North-West Russia. Blackwell Science Ltd Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2002;16:255-62. Trinh LTT, Rubin G. Late entry to antenatal care in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Reproductive Health 2006;3:8. Okoroh EM, Coonrod DV, Champple K, Drachman D. Are neonatal morbidities associated with no prenatal care different from those associated withinadequate prenatal care Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;2:89-97. Titaley CR, Dibley MJ, Roberts CL. Factor associated with underutilization of antenatal care services in Indonesia: results of Indonesia Demographic and health survey 2002/2003 and 2007. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:485. Beeckman K, Louckx F, Putman K. Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan region. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:57. Low P, Paterson J, Wouldes T, Carter S, Williams M, Percival T. Factor affecting antenatal care attendance by mother of pacifiv infant living in New Zealand. The New Zealand Medical Journal. 2005;118:1216. Yakoob MY, Menezes EV, Soomro T, Hawa rA, Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA. Reducing stilbirths: behavi. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2009;9:SI-S3. J.Jackson D, Batiste E, Rendall-Mkosi K. Effect of smoking and alcohol use during pregnancy on the occurence of low birthweight in farming region in South Africa. Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2007;21:432-40. Tarrant R, Younger K, Sheridan-Pereira M, Kearney J. Maternal health behaviours during pregnancy in an Irish obstetric popuation and their associations with socio-demographic and infant characteristics. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2011;1:10. Torres-Arreola LP, Constantino-Casa P, Flores-Hernandez S, Villa-Barragan JP, Marcias ER. Sosioeconomic factors and low birth weight in Mexico MBC Public Health. 2005;5:20. 1. BPS. Kudus dalam angka, 2011. 2. Profil Kabupaten Kudus, 2011 3. SBSI F. Ratusan pekerja pabrik rokok tidak mendapat upah sesua UMK. gajimucom. 2011 Hollowell J, Oakley L, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Gray R. The effectiveness of antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnarable women in high-income countries: systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2011;11:13. Kakaire O, Kaye DK, Osinde MO. Male invol vement in birth preparedness and complication readness for emergency obstetric referral in rural Uganda. Reprodutive Health. 2011;8:12. AS Muula, S Siziya, E Rudatsikira. Parity and maternal education are associated with low birth weight in Malawi. African Health Sciences. 2011 March 2011;11:1. Yousif EM, Hafees ARA. The effect of antenatal care on the probability of neonatal survival at birth, wad madani teaching hospital, Sudan. Sudanese Journal of public Health. 2006;1:4. Kenny LC LT, McNamee R, O'Neill SM, Mills T and Khaskan AS. Advanced Maternal Age and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: Evidence from a Large Contemporary Cohort. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e56583. Carolan MC DM, Biro M and Kealy M. Very advanced maternal age and morbidity in Victoria, Australia: a population based study. BMC pregnancy & Childbirth. 2013;13(80):1471-2393. | in_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Infan t ou tcomes are the result of a pregnancy is the result of favorab le and un favorable ou tcomes. Antena tal care (ANC) which can prevent the occurrence of an unfavorable ou tcomes. Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the socio-demog raphic factors and ANC visi ts w ith unf avorable infan t outcomes and look ing for the most do minan t factor for the occurrence unfavorable infan t ou tcomes.Method: Design of this stud y was mixed method s with sequential explanatory design. The research was conducted in the district of the Kud us, with 92 qu an titative research subjects and pa rticipan ts in the qualitative research as much as 5 mothers. Quan titative research data tak en f rom medical records. Bivariab le a na lyzes using Spearman Rank test, for using a multivariab le logistic regression analysis. Results of quantitative analysis using in depth interview with analysis qualitative.Results: The results showed tha t socio-demog raphic factors correlated with the results of infant outcomes. Parity (r = -0,224., P = 0.032) and education (r = 0.208., P = 0 .047 ). ANC visits correlated with inf ant outcome results, f or nu mber of visits (r = 0.206 ., P = 0.049 ) and time of visit (r = -0.455 ., P = 0.000). Multivariate analysis showed that the most do minant is time of visit for u nfavorable infant ou tcomes (p = 0.00 2), POR
14 .150, 95% CI (2.584 to 77.484). Based on qualitative analysis, there are four f actors that cause an unfavorable inf ant ou tcomes is maternal behavior, health services. environ ment an d maternal cond ition s.Conclusi on: In this stud y is that high parity, low education, lesser o f nu mber visit and later time of visit correlated with an unfavorable of infant outcomes. Time of visit became the most do minant factor f or the occurrence an unfavorab le of infant outcomes and results are supported of the qualitative analysis that maternal behaviors, health care, environ mental and maternal cond ition s lea d to unfavorable infant outcomes. | in_ID |
