| dc.identifier.citation | Bonwell C.C, Eison J.A. 2001. Active Learning : Creating Excitement in The Classroom. http:// www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/91-9dig.htm. (diakses 13 November 2006) Carolyn W Rouviere. (2001). Continous Evaluation Using Cooperative Learning. http:// www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/coopcollab/index_sub4.html (diakses 8 November 2006) David, Johnson R, 2001. Cooperative Learning. <http://www.clcrc.com/pages/cl.html. (diakses 10 November 2006) Educational Broadcasting Corporation. 2004. How do Cooperative Learning Differ From The Traditional Approach. http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/coopcollab/ index_sub2.html (diakses 15 November 2006) Gallo P.B, Jacobs. G.M. 1999. Using Cooperative Learning to Integrate Thinking and Information Technology in a Content-Based Writing Lessons. http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Tan- Cooperative.html (Diakses 1 November 2006) Johnson, Smith. 2002. Traditional Versus Cooperative Groups. http://groups.physics.umn.edu/physed/ Research/CGPS/trdvscoop.html (diakses 2 November 2006) Riyanto, A. 2003. Proses Belajar Mengajar Efektif di Perguruan Tinggi. Penerbit YAPEMDO. Bandung Roger T, David J. 2002. Coopeative Learning. Two Heads Learn Better Than One. http://edtech.kennesaw.edu/intech/cooperativelearning.htm (diakses 6 November 2006) Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta Sukmadinata N. S. 2005. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung Wikipedia. 2006. Cooperative Learning. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_learning# Four_Types_of_Cooperative_Learning (diakses 10 November 2006) Zaini H. 2002. Desain Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. Centre for Teaching Staff Development. IAIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta _____ , dkk. 2004. Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif. Centre for Teaching Staff Development. IAIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Traditional learning method especially at courses which support the development of public
health profession policy (qualitative research method) needs learning methods improvisation so
that the learning process can be inovative and condusive (cooperative learning). To analyze the
students’ interaction ability, sharing ability, responsibility, positive dependant, self esteem, work in
groups ability, and problem solving ability by applying “cooperative learning” in developing the
ability to compose research proposal. Research and development through pre-survey, planning,
trial, validation, validation test and dessemination. The targets were the students of Public Health
Department, Medical Science Faculty, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta who had taken
Research Methods (pre requisite) as many as 28 students. Cooperative Learning Model which was
done through Think Pair Share, Round Robin Brainstorming, Three Step Interview, Jigsaw, Three
Minute Review, and Send A Problem methods could create students ability to think critically, ability
to exchange information, ability to interact, ability to solve problems, ability to work in groups, and
ability to make a mutual dependancy in groups. The evaluation to the final results of learning,
individual performance, group performance, and learning method of the students was considered
good (+ 69,02%), good enough (+ 17,3%), and poor (+ 13,65%). The research proposals resulted
from this research classified into good (B) as much as 92,86% and good enough (C) as much as
7,14%. By applying Cooperative Learning, students can interact, share, be responsible, solve problems,
create self esteem, and depend on their friends positively. The proposals could be produced after
students have the ability to analyze creatively and synthesize creatively as well. | en_US |
