Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDeasyanti
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-11T04:40:56Z
dc.date.available2016-05-11T04:40:56Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-11
dc.identifier.citationAllodi, M. W. 2010b. “The meaning of social climate of learning environments: Some reasons why we do not care enough about it”. Learning Environments Research, no. 13, vol. 2, 89-104. doi: 10.1007/s10984-0109072-9 Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). High-stakes testing & student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18), 174http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v1 0n18.2002 doi:doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v10n18.2 002 Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. 2006. Authoritarian parenting style in Asian societies: A cluster-analytic investigation. Contemporary Family Therapy, no. 28, vol. 1, 131-151. http://link.springer.com/article/10.10 07/s10591-006-9699-y Au, W. 2010. The idiocy of policy: The antidemocratic curriculum of high-stakes testing. Critical Education, no. 1, vol. 1, 115.http://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.ph p/criticaled/article/view/182239 Au, W. 2011. Teaching under the new Taylorism: high‐stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, no. 43, vol.1, 25-45. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2010.521261 Awartani, M., Whitman, C. V., & Gordon, J. 2008. Developing instruments to capture young people's perceptions of how school as a learning environment affects their well-being. European Journal of Education, no. 43, vol. 1, 51-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00337.x Babad, E. 1993. Teachers' differential behavior. Educational Psychology Review, no. 5, vol. 4, 347-376. doi: http://link.springer.com/article/10.10 07/BF01320223 Baker, J. A. 1998. The social context of school satisfaction among urban, low-income, African-American students. School Psychology Quarterly, no. 13, vol. 1, 25-44. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h 0088970 Baker, J. A. 1999. Teacher-student interaction in urban at-risk classrooms: Differential behavior, relationship. Elementary School Journal, no. 100, vol. 1, 57-70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1002161 Baker, J. A., Dilly, L. J., Aupperlee, J. L., & Patil, S. A. 2003. The developmental context of school satisfaction: Schools as psychologically healthy environments. School Psychology Quarterly, no. 18, vol. 2, 206-221. http://agneswater1770highschool.yol asite.com/resources/schooling%20an d%20student%20wellness.pdf Braun, V., & Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, no. 3, vol. 2, 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/147808870 6qp063oa Braun, V., & Clarke, V. 2013. Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE Publication. Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T. B., & King, L. A. 2009. Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, no. 4, vol. 3, 208-211. doi: 10.1080/17439760902844400 Clement, N. 2010. Student well-being at school: The actualization of values in education. In T. Lovat, N. Clement & R. Toomey (Eds.), International research handbook on values education and student well-being (pp. 19-36). New York: Springer. Cook-Sather, A. 2006. Sound, presence, and power:“Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, no. 36, vol. 4, 359-390. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/ 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x Cook-Sather, A. 2007. Resisting the impositional potential of student voice work: Lessons for liberatory educational research from poststructuralist feminist critiques of critical pedagogy. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education no. 28, vol. 3, 389-403. doi: 10.1080/01596300701458962 Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2 ed.). California: SAGE Publications. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. 2008a. Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, no. 9, vol. 1, 1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. 2008b. Selfdetermination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, no. 49, vol. 3, 182-185. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0 012801 Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. 2004. Schools, academic motivation, and stage‐environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2 ed., pp. 125-155). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.au/books?h l=en&lr=&id=_wXasY1HyAYC&oi =fnd&pg=PA125&dq=Schools,+aca demic+motivation,+and+stage%E2% 80%90environment+fit&ots=DS1w6 RZMVp&sig=SDCKkv0xfCGPggg YjKswpVv5wTY#v=onepage&q=Sc hools%2C%20academic%20motivati on%2C%20and%20stage%E2%80% 90environment%20fit&f=false. Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Weisserberg, R. P., Frey, K. S., Haynes, N. M., Kessler, R., . . . Shrivr, T. P. 1997. “Promoting Social & Emotional Learning: Guidelines for Teachers”. Virginia, USA: ASCD Publication. Engels, N., Aelterman, A., Van Petergem, K., & Schepens, A. 2004. Factors which influence the well-being of pupils in Flemish secondary schools. Educational Studies (03055698), no. 30, vol. 2, 127-143. doi: 10/1080.0305569032000159787 Epstein, J. L., & McPartland, J. M. 1976. Classroom Organization and the Quality of School Life. Report No. 215: Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore M. D. Center for the Study of Social Organization of Schools. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A Hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, no. 5, vol. 1, 80-92. http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/in dex.php/IJQM/article/viewArticle/44 11 Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. 2007. Perceived learning environment and students' emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, no. 17, vol. 5, 478-493. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.001 Goldstein, L. S. 1999. The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the co-construction of mind. American Educational Research Journal, no. 36, vol. 3, 647-673. doi: 10.3102/00028312036003647 Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. 2008. Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, no. 49, vol. 3, 233. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0 012758 Hopkins, E. A. 2008. Classroom conditions to secure enjoyment and achievement: the pupils' voice. Listening to the voice of every child matters. Education 3-13, no. 36, vol. 4, 393-401. doi: 10.1080/03004270801969386 Horowitz, F. D., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Comer, J., Rosebrock, K., Austin, K., & Rust, F. 2005. Educating teachers for developmentally appropriate practices. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Fransisco: John Wiley & Sons. Huebner, E. S., Gilman, R., Reschly, A. L., & Hall, R. 2009. Positive Schools. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2 nd ed.,pp.561-568). New York: Oxford University Press. Immordino‐Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. 2007. We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, brain, and education, no. 1, vol. 1, 310. http://www.learninglandscapes.ca/im ages/documents/ll-no9-final-lr1.pdf#page=115 Kaluge, L., Setiasih, & Tjahjono, H. 2004. The quality improvement of primary children learning through a schoolbased programme in Indonesia http://www.seameo.org/vl/library/DL Welcome/projects/jasper/jasper04/jas per04.pdf Konu, A., & Rimpela, M. 2002. Well-being in school: a conceptual model. Health Promotion International, no. 17, vol. 1, 79-87. doi: 10.1093/heapro/17.1.79 Koretz, D. M., McCaffrey, D. F., & Hamilton, L. S. 2001. Toward a framework for validating gains under high-stakes conditions.www.cse.ucla.edu/produc ts/Reports/TR551.pdf Leonard, C., Bourke, S., & Schofield, N. 2004. Affecting the affective: Affective outcomes in the context of school effectiveness, school improvement and quality schools. Issues in Educational Research, no. 14, vol. 1, 1-28. http://www.iier.org.au/iier14/leonard .html Levin, B. 2000. Putting students at the centre in education reform. Journal of Educational Change, no. 1, vol. 2, 155-172. http://link.springer.com/article/10.10 23/A:1010024225888 Lingard, B. 2010. Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, no. 51, vol. 2, 129-147. doi: 10.1080/17508481003731026 Long, R. F., Huebner, E. S., Wedell, D. H., & Hills, K. J. 2012. Measuring school‐related subjective well‐being in adolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, no. 82, vol. 1, 50. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j. 1939-0025.2011.01130.x Madaus, G. F., & Clarke, M. 2001. The adverse impact of high stakes testing on minority students: Evidence from 100 years of test data. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED45 0183.pdf Madaus, G. F., Russell, M. K., & Higgins, J. 2009. The paradoxes of high stakes testing: How they affect students, their parents, teachers, principals, schools, and society. USA: Information Age Publishing. Marsigit. 2013. Tantangan dan harapan kurikulum 2013 bagi pendidikan matematika. Paper presented at the Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, Yogyakarta Indonesia. http://www.academia.edu/3727714/T antangan_dan_Harapan_Kurikulum_ 2013 McGrath, H., & Noble, T. 2014. Respectful teacher-student relationships. http://www.safeschoolshub.edu.au/sa fe-schools-toolkit/the-nineelements/element-2/activities Natal, P. 2014. Disfungsi Sosial Pendidikan Nasional. Retrieved 28 August, 2014, from http://www.satuharapan.com/readdetail/read/disfungsi-sosialpendidikan-nasional Noddings, N. 2003. Happiness and education. New York: Cambridge University Press. OECD/ADB. 2015. Education in Indonesia: rising to the challenge. Reviews of National Policies for Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/978926423 0750-en Oldfather, P. 1995. Songs "come back most to them": Students' experiences as researchers. Theory Into Practice, no. 34, vol. 2, 131-136. doi: 10.1080/00405849509543670 Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. 2000. Effects of schools, teaching staff and classes on achievement and wellbeing in secondary education: Similarities and differences between school outcomes. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, no. 11, vol. 2, 165-196. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/ 10.1076/0924-3453(200006)11:2;1Q;FT165#.Vjh4Q7crLcs Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. 2007. The control -value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions in education (pp. 13-36). San Diego: CA Academic Press. Polesel, J., Dulfer, N., & Turnbull, M. 2012. The Experience of Education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families. http://uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_f ile/0008/276191/High_Stakes_Testin g_Literature_Review.pdf Reeve, J. 2004. Self-determination theory applied to educational setting. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183-204). New York, USA: The University of Rochester Press. Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. 2004. Self-determination theory, a dialectical framework for understanding sociocultural influence on student motivation. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (Vol. 4, pp. 31-60). USA: Information Age Publishing. Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. 2007. Theorizing student voice: Values and perspectives. Improving Schools, no. 10. Vol. 1, 5-17. doi: 10.1177/1365480207073702 Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Strobel, K. R. 1998. Linking the study of schooling and mental health: Selected issues and empirical illustrations at the level of individual. Educational Psychologist, no. 33, vol. 4, 153-176. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3304_2 Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. 1996. Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents' psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, no. 88, vol. 3, 408-422. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0 022-0663.88.3.408 Ryan, R. M., & Brown, K. W. 2005. Legislating competence: High-stakes testing policies and their relations with psychological theories and research. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 354373). New York: Guilford Press. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2000b. Selfdetermination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, no. 55, vol. 1, 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003066x.55.1.68 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2001. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, no. 52, vol. 1, 141-166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2004. An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of selfdetermination research (pp. 3-33). New York: University of Rochester Press. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. 2008. Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, no. 9, vol. 1, 139-170. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4 Sahlberg, P. 2007. Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, no. 22, vol. 2, 147-171. doi: 10.1080/02680930601158919. Schreuder, O. 2011, November 8-9. "Non Scholae sed Vitae Discimus" Character Education, Threats an Opportunity. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Character Education, Yogyakarta. Seligman, M. E. P., Ernst, R. M., Gillham, J., Reivich, K., & Linkins, M. 2009. Positive education: positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education, no. 35, vol. 3, 293-311. doi: 10.1080/03054980902934563 Stipek, D. 2006. Relationships matter. Educational Leadership, no. 64, vol. 1, 46-49. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ745633 Sukyadi, D., & Mardiani, R. 2011. The washback effect of the English national examination (ENE) on English teachers’ classroom teaching and students’ learning. K@ ta, no. 13, vol. 1, 96-111. doi: 10.9744/kata.13.1.96-111 Sulistyo, G. H. 2010. English as a measurement standard in the National Examination: Some grassroot voice. TEFLIN Journal: A publication on the teaching and learning of English, no. 20, vol. 1, 124. http://jurnalonline.um.ac.id/data/artikel/artikel4 D5FC0DC64735922380D782C2B6E 982E.pdf Syahril, I., & Lesko, N. 2007. Standardised testing in Indonesian secondary education: An analysis on the impact of national exit exam (2005-2007). http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t& rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd= 1&ved=0CB0QFjAA&url=http%3A %2F%2Fpocketknowledge.tc.colum bia.edu%2Fhome.php%2Fviewfile% 2Fdownload%2F58591&ei=4whGV NeJOoLn8AWe6IEg&usg=AFQjCNHHSSdsMzQ1oNyI13gSh5OEM9w PPQ&bvm=bv.77880786,d.dGc Tan, Y. L., & Samudya, Y. 2009. Learning Style versus Teaching Style: How to Match Them?Teaching and Learning Open Forum. http://www.curtin.edu.my/TLForum 2009/images/TLOF09-17.pdf Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. 2003a. Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral science. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. California: SAGE Publications. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). 2003b. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. California: SAGE Publications. Taylor, P. C., & Medina, M. N. D. 2013. Educational research paradigms: From positivism to multiparadigmatic. 1. http://www.meaningcentered.org/edu cational-research-paradigms-frompositivism-to-multiparadigmatic/ Tian, L., Chen, H., & Huebner, E. S. 2013. The longitudinal relationships between basic psychological needs satisfaction at school and schoolrelated subjective well-being in adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 1-20. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0495-4 Van Petegem, K., Aelterman, A., Van Keer, H., & Rosseel, Y. 2008. The influence of student characteristics and interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom on student’s wellbeing. Social Indicator Research:, no. 85, 279–291. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9093-7. Vyverman, V., & Vettenburg, N. 2009. School well-being among young people: is it influenced by the parents' socioeconomic background? Educational Studies, no. 35, vol. 2, 191-204. doi: 10.1080/03055690802470373 Waterman, A. S. 1993. Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, no. 64, vol. 4, 678-691. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0 022-3514.64.4.678 Waterman, A. S. 2008. Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist's perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, no. 3, vol. 4, 234-252. doi: 10.1080/17439760802303002 Wentzel, K. R. 1997. Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, no. 89, vol. 3, 411-419. doi: 10.1037/00220663.89.3.411 Zamroni, M. I. 2008. Potret kegelisahan sekolah dalam melaksanakan ujian nasional. Jurnal Unisia, no. 31, vol. 69, 294-305. http://jurnal.uii.ac.id/index.php/Unisi a/article/viewFile/2697/2484.in_ID
dc.identifier.issn2503-5185
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/7204
dc.description.abstractThe impotance of importance of student well-being in school has been contended by studies of positive psychology in determining student outcomes. School well-being is a related construct and defined in terms of levels of school satisfaction, frequency of positive and negative affect, and useful in framing research focused on student experience. This paper reports on student emotional experiences of primary school students in Jakarta-Indonesia through two different approaches. A questionnaire identified levels of school satisfaction together with positive and negative affect in general, while focus group interviews explored specific situations in which students experience positive and negative emotions in school. Despite students generally feeling well in school, a few students indicated low levels of well-being while students who reported the highest level of satisfaction were not necessarily free from feeling bad in school –they still expressed dissatisfaction with their school experiences. Among several factors associated with student well-being in school, teacher behaviour is a crucial factor. Apart from issues arising concerning the quality of instruction, students pointed out that teacher behaviours, such as favouritism and grumpiness, are sources of negative feelings in school. In contrast, students reported that peer interactions in school are a factor that underpinned their intentions for going to school. Investigating the sources of student emotions in school through listening to their voices has provided valuable data that can assist in understanding the necessary conditions to optimise student well-being in school.in_ID
dc.language.isoenin_ID
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartain_ID
dc.subjectlearning environmentin_ID
dc.subjectschool well-beingin_ID
dc.subjectschool satisfactionin_ID
dc.subjectemotionsin_ID
dc.subjectteacher behavioursin_ID
dc.titleSTUDENT WELL-BEING IN SCHOOL: LISTENING TO STUDENT VOICES OF THEIR EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCESin_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record