| dc.identifier.citation | Rahmawati, F.P. 2015. “Pemakaian Bahasa Ruang Publik di Surakarta” dalam Jurnal Akademia, vol.1, no.2, hlm. 12. Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. 1995. From Teaching to Learning- A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education. Change, 27(6), 12-25. Berk, R. A. 2009. Multimedia Teaching with Video Clips: TV, Movies, You Tube, and mtvU in The College Classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5 (1), 1-21. BSNP. 2007. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 tahun 2007 tentang Standar Proses untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta : Depdiknas. Daryanto. 2010. Media Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Gava Media. Ferrer, L. M. 2005. Developing Understanding and Social Skills through Cooperative Learning. Journal of Science and Mathemathics Education in S.E. Asia, 27 (2), 45-61. Ifamuyiwa, A. S., dan Onakoya, S. K.. 2008. Impact of Think-Pair-Share Instructional Strategy on Students’ Achievement in Secondary School Mathematics. Journal of the Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 48 (1), 26-34. KTSP. 2006. Standar Isi dan Standar Kompetensi Kelulusan Untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar SD/MI. Jakarta: BP Cipta Jaya. Lie, A. 2005. Cooperative Learning. Jakarta: PT Grasindo. Lom, B. 2012. Classroom Activities: Simple Strategies to Incorporate StudentCentered Within Undergraduate Sciences Lectures. The International Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education (June), 11 (1), A64-A71. Lyman, F.T., dan Mctighe, J. 1988. Cueing Thinking in the Classroom: The Promise of Theory-Embedded Tools. Journal Eductional Leadership, 18-24. Pandya, S. 2011. Interactive Effect of Cooperative Learning Model and Learning Goals of Students on AcademicAchievement of Students in Mathemathics. Maviana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 1 (2), 27-34. Piaget, J. 2001. The Psychology of Intelligence “Translated by Malcolm Piercy and D.E Berlyne”. London & New York: Routledge Classics. Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S., & Semmel, M.I. 1974. Instructional Development for Teachers of Exceptional Children. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Leadership Training Institute/Special Education, University of Minnesota. Wade, R. 2002. Beyond Expanding Horizons: New Curriculum Directions for Elemetary Social Studies. The Elementary School Journal, 103 (2), 116-130. Widoyoko, E. P. 2013. Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Winataputra, U. S. 2008b. Materi dan Pembelajaran IPS SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Zhao, Y. & Hoge, J.D. 2005. What Elementary Students and Teachers Say about Social Studies. The Social Studies, 96(5), 216-221. | in_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | The aim of this research was to produce valid, effective, and practicable social studies
learning tools. This was a research and development that followed 4D model. Students of
VA and VB Kemasan elementary school were the subjects of this research. 12 students of
VA were involved in limited experiment, and 26 students of VB were involved in real
teaching experiment. The data collection techniques were derived from test, observation,
questionnaire, interview, and documentation. The data analysis techniques were gained
through qualitative and quantitative descriptive. The learning tools validity had qualified the
valid category. Learning tools were effective, it could be seen from N-gain result that
showed an improvement from pre-test to post-test with score 0.58 included in moderate
category. There were 23 of 26 students had qualified the minimum cognitive score. The
students’ activities observation showed 26 students had qualified the high activity category.
The attitude questionnaire result showed 23 of 26 students had very positive attitude toward
learning process. The Practicability was gained from 4 teachers responses that showed very
positive response with score 74.5 and 23 students also showed very positive response with
score 71.1. According to those results, it could be concluded that the learning tools had
qualified valid, effective, and practicable categories. | in_ID |
