Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHerdian, Herdian
dc.contributor.authorLestari, Sri
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-21T09:32:09Z
dc.date.available2016-10-21T09:32:09Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-27
dc.identifier.citationAnderman, E.M., & Murdock, T.B. (2007).The Psychology Of Academic Cheating. California: Elsevier Academic Press. Arianto, T. (2013).Tingkat Kejujuran Sosial Dan Akademik Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi.Prosiding Seminar Nasional X Pendidikan Biologi, 10 (1) diambil dari http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/ prosbio/articlm e/view/3095 Brimble, M., & Clark, P.T. (2005). Perceptions of the Prevalence and Seriousness of Academic Dishonesty in Australian Universities The Australia. Educational Researcher. 32 (3), 19-44 Davis, S. F., Drinan, P. F., & Gallant, T.B. (2009).Cheating In School. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell Diekhoff.G., LaBeff, E., Clark, R., Williams, L., Francis, B., & Haines, J. V. (1996) College Cheating: Ten Years Later.Research in Higher Education, 37 (4) ,487–502 Finch, J. (1978).The Vignette technique in survey research.Sosiology, 21 (1), 105-144. Doi: 10.1177/0038038587021001008 Jensen, L, A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It‘s Wrong, But Everybody Does It: Academic Dishonesty Among High School And College Students. Contemporary Educational Psychology 27, 209–228 Jones, L. R. (2011). Academic Integrity & Academic Dishonesty: A Handbook About Cheating & Plagiarism. Floride Institude of Technology Revised & Expanded Edition diambil dari www.fit.edu/current/documents/pl agiarism.pdf Kibler, W. L. (1993). Academic Dishonesty: A Student Development Dilemma. Naspa Journal. 30. 253-262. Lestari, S., & Asyanti, S. (2015). Apakah siswa SMP berperilaku jujur dalam situasi ulangan?.The 2nd University Research Coloquium 2015 ISSN 2407-9189 Manurung, R. (2012). Pendidikan Antikorupsi Sebagai Satuan Pembelajaran Berkarakter Dan Humanistik. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 27 (11). Miller, N. D., Murdock, T.B., Anderman, C.M., & Poindexter, A.L. (2007).Who are all these cheaters? Characteristics of academically dishonest students.Dalam E. M. Anderman & T. B. Murdock.Psychology of academic cheating, hal 9-32. London: Elsevier Academic Press. Minarcik, J., & Bridges, A. J. (2015). Psychology Graduate Students Weigh In: Qualitative Analysis of Academic Dishonesty and Suggestion. J Acad Ethics, 13:197– 216 Moleong, L. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Murphy, M.M., & Banas, S. L. (2009).Character Education Overcoming Prejudice. New york: Chelsea House publisher Nugraha, A., & Dina, D. (2009).Pelibatan Orang tua dan Masyarakat dalam masalah kekerasan pada anak usia dini. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Nursalam, Bani, S., & Munirah. (2013). Bentuk Kecurangan Akademik (Academic Cheating) Mahasiswa PGMI Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan Uin Alauddin Makassar.Lentera Pendidikan, 16 (2). 127-138 Parwito. (2015). Hanya Bayar Rp 12,5 Juta Bisa Dapat Gelar S1 Tanpa Kuliah & Skripsi. Kompas Online. Dipetik Agustus 24, 2015 dari http://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/h anya-bayar-rp-125-juta-bisa-dapat- gelar-s1-tanpa-kuliah-skripsi.html Rangkuti, A. A. (2011). Academic cheating behavior of accounting students: a case study in Jakarta State University. Educational integrity: Culture and values, 105-109 Roig, M., & Caso, M. (2005) Lying And Cheating: Fraudulent Excuse Making, Cheating, And Plagiarism. The Journal of Psychology, 139 (6), 485–494. Warsiyah, (2013). Perilaku menyontek mahasiswa muslim (pengaruh tingkat keimanan, prokrastinasi akademik dan sikap terhadap menyontek pada perilaku menyontek mahasiswa Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Walisongo). Tesis (tidak diterbitkan). Program magister Institut agama islam negeri (iain) walisongo dipetik mei 6, 2016 dari eprints.walisongo.ac.id/31/1/Warsiya h_Tesis_Sinopsis.pdf Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors Associated With Cheating Among College Students: A Review. Research in Higher Education, 39 (3), 235– 274.Yulianto, H. (2015). Persepsi mahasiswa tentang ketidakjujuran akademik: studi kasus mahasiswa Program Vokasi Universitas Indonesia. Prosiding, Seminar Psikologi & Kemanusiaan, ISBN: 978-979-796-324-8in_ID
dc.identifier.issn2407-9189
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/7748
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to describe the academic dishonesty of students at early childhood education program in final exam situation and the factors that influence the behaviour. Thedata were obtained from 42 female students of early childhood education program in private university of Purwokerto using open questionnaire in the form of vignette. The result showed that the proportion of students who are honest is 33% on the absent of supervisor. But on the present of supervisor, the proportion of students who are honest is 71%. The dishonesty behaviour of students is influenced by dishonesty behaviour of others in the environment and need to easily achieve a good score. Whereas the honesty behaviour of students is encouraged by internal condition such as self-confident and firmly hold the honesty value.in_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherSTIKES Muhammadiyah Pekajanganin_ID
dc.subjectacademic dishonestyin_ID
dc.subjectundergraduate studentsin_ID
dc.subjectvignettein_ID
dc.subjectqualitative researchin_ID
dc.titleApakah Calon Pendidik Jujur Saat Mengerjakan Ujian Akhir Semester?in_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record