| dc.identifier.citation | Anwar. 2006. “Penggunaan Peta Konsep Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD untuk meningkatkan Proses, Hasil Belajar, dan Respons pada Konsep Ekosistem”. Dalam Jurnal Penelitian Kependidikan. Tahun 16 Nomor 1 Desember. Hal. 217-244. Dallimore, Elice. J. Hertenstein Julie H. dan Platt Majorie B. 2010 Issues In Accounting Education. Class Participation in Accounting Courses: Factors That Affect Student Comfort and Learning American Accounting Association DOI:10.2308/iace.2010.25.4.613. Vol.25.N0.4 2010pp. 613-629. Depdikbud., 2014. Materi Pelatihan Guru Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015, Jakarta: Penerbit BPSDMPK dan PMP. Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri dan Aswan Zain. 2010. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Gregory Kenneth, Laing 2012. Higgher Education Studies Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education I integration of acomputer Application in a first Year Accounting Curriculum: An Evaluation of Student Attitudes, School of Accounting & Finance, Faculty of Commerce University of Wollongong, Australia, Vol. 2. No.2;June 2012. Hamdani. 2011. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Pustaka Setia. Hamalik, Oemar. 2007. Manajemen Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya. Iskandar, Srini M. 2006. ” Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Dasar-Dasar Sains dengan Mengggunakan Pembelajaran Berkelompok (Learning Together) dan Pembelajaran Timbal Balik (Reciprokal Teaching)”. Dalam Jurnal Penelitian Kependidikan. Tahun 16 Nomor 1 Juni. Kirkham, Ross 2013. An Approach to Improving the Learning Experience for First Year Accounting Currriculum University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia. EJournal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching. Vol. 7, No.1. 2013, pp.74-81. Lestianto. 2011 Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif CIRC berbasis lesson Study untuk meningkatkan asil belajar siswa untuk mata kuliah kewirausahaan.Malang: FE, UM. Martini, dkk. 2006. “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Aspek Psikomotr Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Laboratorium pada siswa Kelas XI IPA I SMA Negeri I Jombang.” Dalam Jurnal Penelitian Kependidikan. Tahun 16 Nomor 2 Desember. Hal. 245-255. Miles, Matthew B. dan A. Michael Huberman. 2007. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia. Sarjono, Yetty dan Suyatmini. 2011 Model penataan Pedagang Kaki Lima di Surakarta Sebagai Solusi Konstruktif Untuk Pemberdayaan Tingkat Pendidikan Anak-anak PKL, EDUKASI, Jurnal Ilmu pendidikan Vol. 10. No. 2. Hal.1-8 Sarjono, Yetty. Dan Suyatmini. 2013. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Ekonomi Berbasis Lingkungan Dengan pendekatan pembelajaran Inovatif di SMA Muhammadiyah di Surakarta, Laporan penelitian Pentaspena, Juni 2013 Sarjono, Yetty dan Suyatmini. 2013 Model Pendidikan Anak-Anak Miskin di Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan. Vol. 8. No. 2, Juli 2012 Hal. 98-111. Sutama. 2010. ”Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, PTK, R&D). Surakarta: Fairuz Media. Vincent. 2012. International Journal For Lesson And Learning Studies Using Learning Study To Improve The Teaching And Learning of Accounting in a School In Brunei Darusalam Vol 1. No.1 2012. P. 23-40 Wafroturrohmah dan Suyatmini, 2008. Penggunaan Metode Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Belajar Mandiri Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Akuntansi Pada Mata Kuliah akuntansi Perpajakan, Jurnal Varia Pendidikan Vol. 20.No. 2 Desember 2008 Hal. 154-163. | in_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | The research aims are to analysis and to describe the development of accounting
learning evaluation on curriculum 2013 based on lesson study. This research
approach used was research and development. The subject of the research is
accounting vocational school teachers at Surakarta.The method research data
collection used were observation, interview and documentation. This research also
used focus group discussion. Data analysis technique used interactive analysis that
involved: data collection, reduction, display and verification. The research results
showed that The development of learning evaluation by Vocational School teachers
at Surakarta is in affective, cognitive, psychomotor was done by using test and non
test in the formed of written test (paper and pencil test) or spoken, job observing,
attitude measurement, assessment of job result, such as: assignment, project and/or
product, portofolio usage, and self assessmet. | in_ID |
