| dc.identifier.citation | bidin, Said Zainal. 2008.Strategi Kebijakan dalam Pembangunan dan Ekonomi Politik. Jakarta. Penerbit Suara Bebas. Asngari, Pang S. 1984. Persepsi Direktur Penyuluhan Tingkat ‘Keresidenan dan Kepala Penyuluh Pertanian Terhadap Peranan dan Fungsi Lembaga Penyuluhan Pertanian di Negara Bagian Texas Amerika Serikat.Bogor. Media Peternakan 9 (2) : 1-43. IPB. Beal. 1964. Adoption of Public Fallout Shelters.Rural Sociology Report No. 49SDepartement of Sociology and Anthropology. State University Iowa. Berlo, 1961.The Process Of Communication: An Introduction To Theory And Practice. New York.Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Brilliant, Eleanor L. dan Kimberlee A. Rice.1988.Influencing Corporate Philantropy. Social Work in the Workplace, New York. Springer Publishing Co. Brown, Lawrence A. 1981. Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective. Methuen. London. Burke, 2004.Sebuah Pendekatan Partisipatif dalam Perencanaan Kota. Bandung. Penerbit Yayasan Sugijanto Soegijoko. Braun JV, McComb J, Fred-Mensah BK, Lorch RP. 1993. “Urban Food Insecurity and Malnutrition in Developing Countries: Trends, Policies, and Research Implication”.International Food Policy Research Institut. Washington DC. Carney, Michael, Gedajlovic. 2001. “CorporateGovernance and Firm Capabilities : A Comparison of Managerial, Alliance, and Personal Capitalisms”.Asia Pacific Journal of Management.Vol. 18, No. 3. Crider. 1983.The Practice of Social Research. 8th edition. USA.Wadsworth Publishing Company. Conyes, Diana. 1991. Perencanaan Sosial di Dunia Ketiga. Gadjah Mada University Press.Yogyakarta. Elkington, John. 1997. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone. Oxford. Gupta, Ashok. 2003. “Why Should Companies Care”. Mid American Journal of Business. Spring Press. Griffin, J. and Mahon, J. 1997.“The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty Five Years Of Incompatible Research”. Business and Society.Vol. 36. Hadisapoetro. S. 1968. Pembangunan Pertanian. Yogyakarta. Fakultas Pertanian UGM. Hadi, Sutrisno. 1993.Methodology Research. Yogyakarta. Fakultas Psikologi UGM. Hofstede, Geert. 1994. Culture and Organizations. HarperCollinsBusiness.Hammersmith. fe Jim. 1995.Community Development:Creating Community Alternatives Vision Analysis and Practice, Longman. Australia. Jung J. 1987. Understanding Human Motivation: A Cognitive Approach. New York. Mc Millan Publishing Co, Inc. Khasali Rhenald. 2003. Manajemen Public Relations. Jakarta. Penerbit Grafiti. Kotler and Lee. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing The Most Good For Your Company and Your Cause. New Jersey.John Willey&Sons. Leavitt. 1978. Psikologi Manajemen. Jakarta. Penerbit Erlangga. Litterer, Joseph A. 1973.The Analysis of Organization.New York. John Wiley & Sons. Mardikanto.T. 1993. Penyuluhan Pembangunan Pertanian. Surakarta.Sebelas Maret University. ------------------. 1994. Mengukur Tingkat Adopsi Dengan Tiga Tolak Ukur.Prima Theresia Pressindo. ------------------. 2004. “Social Welfare Problems and Social Work in Indonesia”.Trends and Issues Masalah Kesejahteraan Sosial dan Pekerjaan Sosial di Indonesia: Kecenderungan dan Isu”. International Seminar on Curriculum Development for Social Work Education in Indonesia.Bandung.Sekolah Tinggi Kesejahteraan Sosial. ------------------. 2009. Sistem Penyuluhan Pertanian. Sebelas Maret University Press. Surakarta. ------------------. 2010. Konsep-konsep Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Sebelas Maret University Press. Surakarta. Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.2007a. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal. Indonesia. -------------------------------------------------.2007b.Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentangPerseroan Terbatas. Indonesia. Newcomb. 1956. Social Psycology. New York. Dryden Press Publishers. Saidi, Abidin. 2003. Sumbangan Sosial Perusahaan, Profil dan Pola Distribusinya di Indonesia: Survei 226 Perusahaan di 10 Kota. PIRAC. Jakarta. Ford Foundation. Saidi., Zaim, dan Hamid Abidin. 2004. Menjadi Bangsa Pemurah: Wacana dan Praktek Kedermawanan Sosial di Indonesia. Jakarta.Piramida. Slamet Margono. 1990. Perspektif Ilmu Penyuluhan Pembangunan Menyongson Era Tinggal Landas. Paper presented at the Seminar Sehari Peranan Penyuluhan Pembangunan Menyongsong Era Tinggal Landas. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. Soetomo.2006, Strategi-Strategi Pembangunan Masyarakat.Yogyakarta.Penerbit.Pustaka Pelajar. Solihin. 2008. Analisis Kebijakan Dari Formulasi Ke Implementasi Kebijakan Negara. Edisi kedua. Jakarta. PT Buni Aksara. Steiner dan Miner. 1997. Kebijakan dan Strategi Manajemen. Jakarta. Penerbit Erlangga. Subejo. 2008. Sistem Penyuluhan di Jepang: Konsep, Peran dan Perkembangan Penyuluhan Pertanian dan Pedesaan.Yogyakarta.UGM. Subejo dan Supriyanto. 2004.Metodologi Pendekatan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta.Fakultas Pertanian. UGM Sugiyono. 2001. Statistik Nonparametris Untuk Penelitian. Bandung. CV Alfabeta. Susiloadi, Priyanto. 2008. “Implementasi Corporate Social Responsiblity Untuk Mendukung Pembangunan Berkelanjutan”. Spirit Publik.Vol. 4.No. 2.Diakses tanggal 21 Desember 2009. Sumodiningrat, Gunawan. 1996a. Ekonometrika Pengantar.Yogyakarta. BPFE ----------------------------------. 1996b, Pembangunan Daerah dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jakarta. Bina Rena Pariwara. Suharto Edi. 2005.Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Masyarakat. Bandung. Refika Aditama. ----------------.2007. Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat: Kajian Strategis Pembangunan Kesehatan Sosial dan Pekerjaan Sosial. Bandung. Rafika Aditama. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 tahun 2006 tentang Sistem Penyuluhan Pertanian, Perikanan, dan Kehutanan. Jakarta. Verhangen. 1979. Corporate Citizenship. Germany. Wood, D. J.2002. “Corporate Social Performance Revisited”.Academy of Management Review. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The objectives of this research are: (1) to explain the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR) developed by of PT. HolcimIndonesia Tbk. Cilacap Plant; (2) to explain the activities of the
community empowerment conducted by the Limited Liability Company of PT. HolcimIndonesia
Tbk. Cilacap Plant; (3) to explain the perception and participation of the community on the activities
of the community empowerment conducted by the Limited Liability Company of PT.
HolcimIndonesia Tbk. Cilacap Plant; (4) to reveal the factors influencing the evaluation on the
results and benefits of the community empowerment; and (5) to formulate the model which can be
done in the community empowerment through CSR developed by the Limited Liability Company of
PT. HolcimIndonesia Tbk. Cilacap Plant.
This research used the explanatory and correlational study. The data and information of the research
were explored in depth. The samples of the research were taken by using group random sampling
with many phases. The population of the research consisted of 612, and the respondents of the
research were 250. The data of the research were analyzed by using path analysis.
The results of the research show that: (1) the concept of CSR of the Limited Liability Company of
PT. Holcim Indonesia Tbk. Cilacap Plant has shown the high commitment toward the
implementation of its CSR; (2) the results of the community empowerment activities cover
education, health, economy, and environment with adequate budget allocations; (3) the perception
and participation of the community toward the community empowerment activities are high and are
strengthened by the results and benefits of CSR; (4) the factors influencing the evaluation on the
benefits of the community empowerment are as follows: (a) the evaluation on the results of the
empowerment that all of the perceptions of the community have significant effects, which include
perceptions on the group dynamics, government support, community’s participation in the
empowerment, variety of benefit recipients, variety of CSR activities, performance of CSR, and
CSR b) internal factors, c) external factors, and d) information on CSR; (5) the formulations of
model in the community empowerment activities through CSR on the evaluation of the community
empowerment benefits through CSR activities include the following: a) the evaluation of the
empowerment results, b) the participation of the community in the empowerment, c) perception on
the group dynamics, d) perception on the variety of CSR activities, e) the community’s perception
on CSR, f) internal and external factors, and g) information on CSR. | en_US |
