Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPraswati, Aflit Nuryulia
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-21T03:17:03Z
dc.date.available2017-07-21T03:17:03Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-24
dc.identifier.citationArnkil R., Järvensivu A., Koski P. and Piirainen T. (2010), Exploring Quadruple Helix Outlining user-oriented innovation models, Final Report on Quadruple Helix Research for the CLIQ project, under the Interreg IVC Programme. Carayannis E. G., Barth T. D. and Campbell D. F. J. (2012), The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 2012, 1:2. Carayannis E. G. and Campbell D. F. J. (2006), Mode 3: meaning and implications from a knowledge systems perspective, in Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters, (pp. 1–25), Westport, CN: Praeger. Carayannis E. G. and Campbell D. F. J. (2009), Mode 3 and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3), 201-234. Carayannis E. G. and Campbell D. F. J. (2010), Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a transdisciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology, International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development 2010, 1(1):41–69. Carayannis E.G. and Campbell D.F.J. (2012), Mode 3 Knowledge Production 1 in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems. Carayannis E.G. and Rakhmatullin R. (2014), The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, DOI 10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8 Springer Science and Business Media, New York, 2014. Eskelinen J., García Robles A., Lindy I., Marsh J., Muente-Kunigami A. (Eds.) (2015), Citizen-Driven Innovation – A Guidebook for City Mayors and Public Administrators, World Bank and ENoLL. Etzkowitz H. and Klofsten M. (2005), The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development, R&D Management, Vol. 35, Issue 3, pp. 243–255. Etzkowitz H. and Leydesdorff L. (1995), The Triple Helix. University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development, EASST Review 14, 14-19. Etzkowitz H. and Ranga M. (2010), A Triple Helix System for Knowledge-based Regional Development: From Spheres to Spaces. Etzkowitz H., Ranga M., Benner M., Guaranys L., Maculan A. M. and Kneller R. (2008), Pathways to the entrepreneurial university: towards a global convergence, Science and Public Policy, 35(9), November 2008, pages 681–695. Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C. and Cantisano Terra B.R. (2000), The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research Policy, Volume 29, Issue 2, February 2000, Pages 313–330. Fagerberg J. (2003), Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2003, Volume 13, Number 2, Page 125. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Seot P. and Trow M. (1994), The new production of knowledge - The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, SAGE Publications London. Ranga M. and Etzkowitz H. (2012), A Triple Helix System for Knowledge-based Ranga M. and Etzkowitz H. (2013), Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society, Industry and Higher Education 27 (4): 237-262. Ranga M. and Garzik L. (2015), From Mozart to Schumpeter: A Triple Helix Systems approach to advancing regional innovation in the Salzburg region of Austria, in: Austrian Council for Research and Technology Development (Ed., 2015): Designing the future: economic, societal and political dimensions of innovation. Echomedia Buchverlag, Vienna, August 2015. Romer P. M. (1986), Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, 1002–37. Romer P. M. (1993), Ideas and things: The concept of production is being retooled (The Future Surveyed: 150 Economist Years), The Economist: (September 11, 1993) F70(3). Schoen A., Laredo P., Bellon B. and Sanchez P. (2007), Observatory of European University, PRIME Position Paper. Schumpeter J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Transaction Publishers, 1934 (first edition in 1911). Schumpeter J. A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper & Brothers. Skawińska E., Wojewoda I., Lubimow I. and Barska A. (2013), Metal Cluster of The Lubuskie Region – Interaction in The Triple Helix, in Innovative Regional Development - Instruments supporting development of regional institutional links, edited by Matylda Bojar, Lublin. Sobel R.S. (2015), Economic Freedom and Entrepreneurship, School of Business Administration, The Citadel. Solow R. M. (1956), A contribution to the theory of economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 70, 65– 94. Utrecht Region (2012), Smart Specialisation Strategy for sustainable innovation in the Utrecht Region (S3 for SURE) - The Utrecht region: transition hub for urban sustainability. Viale R. and Ghiglione B. (1998), The Triple Helix model: a Tool for the Study of European Regional Socio Economic Systems, Fondazione Rosselli. Virkkala S., Mäenpää A. and Mariussen A. (2014), The Ostrobothnian Model of Smart Specialisation, Proceedings of the University of Vaasa, Reports 195. Voicilas D.M. (2014), Cereal market in Romania-regional competitiveness, in Romanian Academy-Institute of Agricultural Economics. Woo Park H. (2014), Transition from the Triple Helix to N-Tuple Helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell, Scientometrics (2014) 99:203–207, DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-1124-3. Yawson R. M. (2009), The Ecological System of Innovation: A New Architectural Framework for a Functional Evidence-Based Platform for Science and Innovation Policy, The Future of Innovation Proceedings of the XXIV ISPIM 2009 Conference, Vienna, Austria, June 21–24, 2009.in_ID
dc.identifier.isbn978-602-361-067-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/9022
dc.description.abstractInnovation plays an important role in improving economic growth and competitiveness of a country. The realization of innovation requires the support of various parties. This support or participation is often called the helix concept. This concept continues to evolve with the changes that occur in society. This paper is a literature study, aiming to find out the development of the helix concept, from Triple Helix (TH), Quadruple Helix (QH) and Quintuple Helix (QuH). TH discusses the role of university, industry and government towards the creation of knowledge and innovation. The TH concept is coupled with the role of civil society and the media-based society. It then develops into QuH: the creation of competitive innovation requires the interaction of the education system, (2) the economic system, 3) the natural environment, (4) the media-based and the culture-based society (also the civil society), (5) and the political system.in_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherMuhammadiyah University Pressin_ID
dc.subjectinnovationin_ID
dc.subjecttriple helixin_ID
dc.subjectquadruple helixin_ID
dc.subjectquintuple helixin_ID
dc.titlePerkembangan Model Helix dalam Peningkatan Inovasiin_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record