Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFauziati, Endang
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-07T02:32:07Z
dc.date.available2018-06-07T02:32:07Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.identifier.citationAgustien, H.I.R. 2006.Text-Based Curriculum and Genre Approach. A plenary paper presented at UPI National Seminar, 27 February 2006. Celce-Murcia, M., Z. Dornyei, S. Thurrell 1995. Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content Specifications. In Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6/2: 5-35. Eggins, S. (1994) An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. HarlowEssex: Longman Group Limited.Halliday, M.A.K. (1979). Linguistics in teacher education. In J. Maling-Keepes & B.D. Keepes (Eds.), Language in education. The language development project. Phase 1 (pp. 279286). Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre, Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K. and C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (2004) Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd Edition, London: Edward Arnold. Social –Semiotic Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press. Hammond et. al. 1992. English for Special Purposes: A handbook for Teachers of Adult Literacy. Sydney: NCELTR. Martin, J. R. (2001). Language, register and genre. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a global context: A reader (pp. 149-166). London: Routlege/Macquarie University/The Open University. Mel Silberman. 1999. Active learning: Strategies to Teach Any Subject. Allyn and Bacon: Needham Heights, Massachusetts McLeod, Saul (2014) Lev Vygotsky. Retrieved on December 20 th , 2015 Lock, G. (1996). Functional English grammar: An introduction for second language teachers.Cambridge: Cambridge UP Wells, B. 1987. “Apprenticeship in Literacy”. In Interchange 18,1/2: 109-123.id_ID
dc.identifier.issn2621-1661
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/9957
dc.description.abstractApplied-linguists study language use in context such as the contexts associated with specialized registers (e.g., business or academic), contexts for language learning (e.g., classrooms and study abroad programs), and contexts for language assessment (e.g., speaking and writing tests). As a result, many of them are interested in linguistic theory that takes into account the contextual dimensions of language. Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) views language as a social semiotic resource people use to accomplish their purposes by expressing meanings in context (Halliday, 1985). This perspective is refreshing to applied linguists since it offers a framework for their work. In SFL, language must be studied in contexts such as professional settings, classrooms, and language tests. This paper is particularly meant to present the role of systemic functional linguistic theory in language teaching in Indonesia. Three topics have been chosen for discussion, namely an overview of systemic functional linguistics, pedagogical implication, and SFL Genre-Based Approach in Language Education in Indonesian schools.id_ID
dc.language.isootherid_ID
dc.publisherSeminar Nasional Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (SEMNAS KBSP) IV 2016id_ID
dc.titleSystemic-Functional Linguistics and Its Implication in Foreign Language Teachingid_ID
dc.typeArticleid_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record