Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTrisnawati, Rina
dc.contributor.authorSiwi, Wahyuni Murwani
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-02T09:51:19Z
dc.date.available2012-05-02T09:51:19Z
dc.date.issued2009-12
dc.identifier.citationArikunto, Suharsimi. 1999. Manajemen Personalia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Ashir and David J. Kallen and Thomas Mathew. 2002. Valunteer Faculty : What Reward or Incentives Do They Prefer ?. Cokkege of Human Medicine. Departement of Pediatries and Human Development. Michigan State University. East Lansing, Michigan. USA. Creddem & Sherman. 1976. Personel Management. Edition South. Western:Publishing Co. Esharenana E. Adoni and Ufuoma Eruvwe, 2004, Staff Discipline in Nigerian University Libraries, Library Management Emerald Group Publishing Limited-ISSN Flippo, E. B. 1994, Manajemen Personalia, Erlangga, Jakarta. Hadi, Sutrisno. 1995. Metodologi Penelitian Jilid II. Yogyakarta: FakultasPsikologi UGM. Hasibuan, S.P. Malayu. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Heidjrahman dan Suad Husnan. 1991. Manajemen Personalia. Edisi 4.Yogyakarta: BPFE. Hergenhahn, B. 1997. An Introduction to Theorities of Learning (5th ed), New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc. Kartono, K. 1998. Pengantar Metodelogi Research Social. Bandung: Salemba. Keith Devia & William Wether. 1989. Fundamental Organizational Behaviour. New Delhi: Mc. Grow-Hill Company. Leteiner, R. A. and Levina T.S. 1990. Organizational dan Behaviour and Human Performance. Jakarta: PT. Prellindo. Leteiner, R. Alfreid. 1990. Teknik Memimpin Pegawai dan Pekerja. Jakarta: Aksara Baru. Mangkunegara, A. P. 2000, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Mar’at. 1994. Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.Matthias Krakel. 2008. Emotios and Compensation, Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR) Fachverlag Gmbh Germany. Nawawi, Hadari. 1984. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Bisnis Yang Kompetitif. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press. Nelson, B. 2001. 1001 Cara Menghargai Karyawan. Jakarta.Pustaka: Delapratasa. Nitisemito, A.S. 1996, Manajemen Personalia (Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia). Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. ___________. 1996, Manajemen Personalia (Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia), Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta. Prihanto. 1994. Handout Psikologi Belajar. Surabaya: Fakultas Psikologi . Rynes, Genhart dan Parks. 2007. Psikologi Personalia: Evaluasi Kinerja Dan Upah Kerja, Performance Improvement Quarterly 10 (1) pp 52-63. Santoso, R. 1990. Riset Pemasaran. Jakarta: Erlangga. Sara L. Rynes, Barry Gerbert and Laura Parks, 2004, Psikologi Personalia: Evaluasi Kinerja danUpah Kerja. Graduate School of Business, University of Winconsin, Madison, Winconsin-USA. Simamora, H. 1995, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN. Siswanto, B. 2003, Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia: Pendekatan Administratif dan Operasional. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara. Soekadji, S. 1983, Memodifikasi Perilaku: Penerapan Sehari-hari dan Penerapan Profesional. Yogyakarta: Liberty. Soetjipto, B. 2002, Paradogma Baru Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.Yogyakarta: Amara Books. Steers, Richard M. 1984. Organizational Behaviour. New York: Scott. Foresman and Co. Steven J. Condly, Richard E. Clark and Harold D. Stolovich, 2003, The Effects of Incentives on Workplace Performance A Meta-analytic Review of Research Studies, Performance Improvement Quarterly 16(3) pp 46-63.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1411-3422
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/1354
dc.description.abstractThis research aim to study and analysis the difference of officers discipline before and after economic subsidy given.by token economy method at Dinas P dan K Gantiwarno, Klaten. The population applied in this research is all officers in offices which include in Dinas P dan K Gantiwarno,Klaten. They are 301 respondents as population and 56 respondents are samples used. They are obtained by random sampling method. The analysis used paired sample t-test to analyze the influence of subsidy economic on teachers diciplin. The indicators of discipline are obedient to supervisor, obedient to regulation and timeliness. The result of examination of hypothesis testing indicate that only 2 variables have significant difference value of mean variables. Its indicates the token economy system influence the teachers discipline on obedient to supervisor and timelines. The significant value less than 0.05. Orderliness variable obedient to regulation doesn’t have an effect on giving of subsidy economic either before and also after given. Visible the thing from analysis result which there is no difference t of orderliness to regulation before getting economic subsidy and also after getting economic subsidy (The significance value is more than 0.05)en_US
dc.subjectofficers disciplineen_US
dc.subjecttoken economyen_US
dc.titlePENGARUH PEMBERIAN TUNJANGAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE TOKEN ECONOMY TERHADAP PENINGKATAN KEDISIPLINAN KERJA PEGAWAI DI KANTOR CABANG DINAS P DAN K GANTIWARNO, KLATENen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record