| dc.identifier.citation | Alexandris, Konstantinos; Charilaos Kouthouris and George Girgolas. 2007. Investigating the Relationships Among Motivation. Negotiation, and Alpine Skiing Participation. Journal of Leisure Research. Academic Research Library. Vol 39. No. 4. pp. 648667. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2004. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Edisi Revisi IV. Rieneka Cipta. Jakarta. Byrne, Gabriel J.; Frank Bradley. 2007. Culture’s influence on leadership efficiency: How personal and national cultures affect leadership style. Journal of Business Research. UCD Michael Smurfit School of Business. College of Business and Law. University College Dublin. Blackrock. County Dublin. Ireland. 168-175. Colvin, Alexander J.S and Wendy R. Boswell. 2007. The Problem of Action And Interest Aligment: Beyond Job Requirements and Incentive compensation. Human Resource Management Review 17. 38-51. www.soeciesment.com. Ghozali, Imam. 2004. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan program SPSS. Semarang: BP Universitas Diponegoro. Gomes, Cardoso Faustino. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. Handoko, T. Hani. 2003. Manajemen. Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi. 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. Korte, Russel F.; Chermack. Thomas J. 2006. Changing organizational culture with scenario planning. Futures Journal. www.elsevier.com. Lako, Andreas. 2004. Kepemimpinan dan Kinerja Organisasi Isu, Teori, dan Solusi. Yogyakarta: Amara Books. Luthans, Fred. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Alih Bahasa Vivin Andika Yuwono. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Mangkuprawira, Syafri. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Strategik. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Notoatmodjo, Soekidjo. 2003. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. Philip, C. Grant. 2004. What Use Is a Job Description. Personal Journal. Santa Monica. Poerwanto. 2008. Budaya Perusahaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Samsudin, Sadili. 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia. Siagian, P. Sondang. 2004. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Insani. Jakarta: Gunung Agung; Simamora, Henry. 2004. Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: YKPN. Sirait, Justine T. 2006. Memahami Aspek-Aspek Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Organisasi. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. Sopiah. 2008. Perilaku Organisasional. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. Sugiyono. 2003. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sugiyono. 2007. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Suprihanto, John; TH. Agung M. Harsiwi; Prakosa Hadi. 2003. Perilaku Organisasional. Yogyakarta: YKPN. Suwarto, Koeshartono. 2009. Budaya Organisasi Kajian Konsep dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya. Uno, B. Hamzah. 2007. Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya Analisis di Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara. Wahyuddin, M. 2004. Industri dan Orientasi Ekspor Dinamika dan Analisis Spasial. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study were (1) To analyze the contribution of variable
incentives, organizational culture, and analysis work on employee motivation and
Oversight Office of Customs and Excise Customs Type Madya Surakarta. (2) To
know what is the most dominant factor contributing to employee motivation and
Oversight Office of Customs and Excise Customs Type Madya Surakarta.The
population in this study were all employees of the Office of Oversight and Customs
and Excise Customs Surakarta Type Madya of 93 employees. Samples of 93
employees, with the sampling technique with saturated sampling technique.
Engineering data analysis using binary logistic regression analysis. Based on the
research by using binary logistic regression analysis model, the results can be
summarized as follows: (1) Variable incentive, cultural, organizational, and analytical
work has a positive contribution to employee motivation and Oversight Office of
Customs and Excise Customs Type Madya Surakarta, (2) The test results or
expectations B Exp (B) note that the variable incentives have the greatest
contribution compared with a variable analysis of organizational culture and
employee motivation to work on Oversight Office and Customs and Excise Customs
Type Madya Surakarta. This proves the truth of the hypothesis that says the most
dominant variable incentive to contribute to employee motivation and Oversight
Office of Customs and Excise Customs Type Madya Surakarta. | en_US |
