Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuharto, Agus
dc.contributor.authorSetiaji, Bambang
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-23T04:41:52Z
dc.date.available2013-04-23T04:41:52Z
dc.date.issued2012-12
dc.identifier.citationAnonymous. 2006. “Job Satisfaction and Remuneration in The Science Sector”. Australasian Biotechnology. Volume 16 Number 3: 26-28. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Edisi Revisi IV. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. As’ad, Moh. 2005. Teori Ilmu Sumber Daya Manusia, Psikologi Industri. Yogyakarta: Liberty. Cheung, Chau-Kiu, Steven A Scherling. 2007. “Job Satisfaction, Work Values, and Sex Differences in Taiwan’s Organizations”. The Journal of Pshychology, Academic Research Library. Volume 133 Number 5: 563-575. Colvin, Alexander J.S and Wendy R. Boswell. 2007. “The Problem of Action And Interest Aligment: Beyond Job Requirements and Incentive Compensation”. Human Resource Management Review. Volume 17: 38-51. Danim, Sudarwan. 2004. Motivasi Kepemimpinan & Efektivitas Kelompok. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. Ekaningtyas, Diah. 2011. Remunerasi Sebagai Penghargaan Kinerja Pegawai Pemerintah. http://wartawarga.gunadarma.ac.id, diakses tanggal 15 Juni 2011. Ghozali, Imam. 2009. Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Gomes, Faustino Cardoso. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. Hasibuan, Malayu. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara. Kellner, James D. 2005. “Pneumococcal Serotypes in the Elderly”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Volume 41 Number 4: 488-489. Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2005. Metode Kuantitatif : Teori dan Aplikasi untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Edisi I. Yogyakarta: AMP YKPN. Luthans, Fred. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Alih Bahasa Vivin Andika Yuwono. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. Mangkuprawira, Syafri. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Strategik. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Rachmawati, Ike Kusdyah. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. Samsudin, Sadili. 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia. Santone, Thomas J.; Sigler, Kevin J.; Britt, Raymond. 2008. “The Strategic Compensation Planning Process”. Benefits Quarterly, Academic Research Library. Volume 9 Number 4: 85-96. Santoso, Singgih. 2003. Buku Latihan SPSS Statistik Parametrik. Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo. Setiaji, Bambang. 2004. Panduan Riset Dengan Pendekatan Kuantitatif. Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana UMS. Siagian, P. Sondang. 2004. Kiat Meningkatkan Produktivitas Kerja. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. Sirait, Justine T. 2006. Memahami Aspek-Aspek Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Organisasi. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. Sopiah. 2008. Perilaku Organisasional. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. Sugiyono. 2007. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Suprihanto, John; Harsiwi M. Agung; Hadi Prakosa. 2005. Perilaku Organisasional. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN. Umar, Husein. 2005. Metode Riset Perilaku Konsumen Jasa. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Wibowo. 2007. Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1411-3422
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/2902
dc.description.abstractResearch objectives are (1) To analyze the effect remuneration of job satisfaction at the Immigration Office of Surakarta. (2) To analyze the extent to which job satisfaction can increase job effectiveness at the Immigration Office of Surakarta. The population in this study were all employees of the Office of Immigration Surakarta with its population of 61 people. All members population sampled in the study. The data was collected with a questionnaire arranged in Likert scale. Data analysis techniques to test the research hypotheses using on regression analysis. The results of this study were (1) Remuneration to have a significant influence on employee job satisfaction at the Immigration Office of Surakarta is indicated by the value of beta coefficient of 0.502 and significant level of 0.000. This meant that the hypothesis which states that “Variable remuneration has a significant influence on job satisfaction of employees in the Office Immigration of Surakarta, it’s mean the hypothesis is true. (2) Job satisfaction has a significant influence on the effectiveness working at the Immigration Office of Surakarta is indicated by the value of beta coefficient of 0.725 and significant level of 0.000. This meant that the hypothesis which states that “variable job satisfaction has a significant influence on the effectiveness working in the Office Immigration of Surakarta, it’s mean the hypothesis is true. (3) The direct effect of remuneration on the effectiveness of 0.255 is more dominant than the effect of indirect remuneration to the effectiveness of work through job satisfaction with the number 0.250. This indicates that remuneration directly influence the effectiveness of employees working at the Office Immigration of Surakarta.en_US
dc.publisherlppmumsen_US
dc.subjectremunerationen_US
dc.subjectjob satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectwork effectivenessen_US
dc.titleSTUDI PERSEPSI REMUNERASI KEPUASAN KERJA DAN EFEKTIVITAS KERJA PEGAWAI KANTOR IMIGRASI SURAKARTAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record